Ambajipeta (10141258, v1) does not agree with http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/maps/atlas/28part31.pdf (page 348) There is no enclave. Similarly Amalapuram (10141257, v1) also needs to be corrected (page 354 of the census map above) as there is no exclave in it.

As mentioned in the changeset comment, population and population:date were added from wikidata based on the wikidata mappings done earlier. Most of the places did not have actual population data earlier. This will help in the rendering engines rendering based on the actual population data.

This was reverted as the cadastral based boundaries were not considered legal as per as per https://apsac.ap.gov.in/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/6fc8a37e-7e66-41c4-9260-da1eec193f04

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/76746673 where the changeset comment is:

Thanks for the correction. Can you share the source for the correction, as you rightly said that Bharatmaps did not contain this.

Hi, Chinaganjam mandal relation/10164496 also has an enclave as per Bharat maps, which is not mapped.

Hope, I am not troubling you lot with my discussion points.

The following errors are thrown up about Zarugumalli when I attempted to add wikidata today.

Intersection between multipolygon ways (4)
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@2f468966, code=1606, message=Intersection between multipolygon ways]
Unconnected coastline (2)
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.Coastlines@9901372f, code=903, message=Unconnected coastline]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.Coastlines@9901372f, code=903, message=Unconnected coastline]

I think Zarugumalli has two exclaves as I saw from the census document map and you seem to have mapped one only.

Let me know your feedback.

Nice work.

Glad to see you improving OSM. If you can add address details from their website it would become even better.

Cleaned up some inadvertent edits. Keep up your good work

Thanks for your contribution. I made a minor update to the name and address

There are two NH167A relations. I think one could be deleted.

Welcome. Landuse need not be contained in administrative boundaries. for example for way/738364011#map=18/10.94956/76.09477 could spread even to neighboring administrative areas.

Welcome to OSM. Hope you find osm.wiki helpful for you.

Thanks. As you have been editing several Andhra Pradesh districts, do you see any major errors with Prakasam district (which shares borders with Guntur, Nellore, Kurnool districts) boundary, as it was formed in 1970's. Your answer will help me to know the extent of errors in AP district shapes and might be helpful in taking up corrections.

Thanks Heinz_V for your response. Can you share the steps you are following for updating from Bharatmaps. Are you getting digital data directly from Bharatmaps?

For more information check osm.wiki/Talk:Districts_in_Andhra_Pradesh second section.

https://osmhistory.appspot.com/relation/10153489/6 version is correct, as it is based on revenue village boundaries. You have corrected the shape to align with old district border. Can you explain your reasoning.

http://www.apwrims.ap.gov.in/lischemeHomePage/SRI%20VENKATESWARA%20L%20I%20SCHEME

Got to know about the /dirty suffix for url to refresh the tiles. Now it is working. Thanks