In OSM, it is better to make use of changeset discussions, to facilitate collaboration among the wider community, rather than private email messages. Hence I took the liberty to quote
your email response to provide my response. Hope you do not mind. I quote "I got this email from you copied below:

Did see a simple way I could respond directly back.

The location I tried to identify as an apartment is on the map an unamed village/hamlet/enclave. I happen to know the residents very well for the past ten years. The place is called MGR Nagar. I did not see a category in the list called village. So what can I call it? Curtis Degler"

My response is as follows. You can use the tag called place=village with name=MGR Nagar and population= xxx.

The name tag should reflect the name on the name board if any, otherwise it should be left blank. I have also fixed the track to the nearest valid road segment as per bing imagery wide changeset/139258799
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139220106

Bing imagery does not show evidence of an apartment. If you have local knowledge, it is fine. If it is residential apartment building do not use tourism tag. Use building tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139231251

It is better not to map track roads to fields. Do not duplicate road segments.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139201402

It is better not to map track roads to fields. Do not duplicate road segments.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139201402

Most of these that you mapped are track roads to fields. It is better to focus on roads near residential areas.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139170594

Please provide detailed changeset comments for facilitating review
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147533

way/1193003317 can not be identified from bing imagery. This is part of landuse industrial already. Unless you know the area and name of the plot owner, it is better not to map such things.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147533

This segment way/1190746843 does not match with Bing image. The joining point appears to be not correct. If you do not have actual gps traces, please do not map.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138744080

Good attempt to map building. Bing shows that it is still in construction, as shown by traces of crane.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138704216

Please provide detailed changset comments like "added buildings and features in <place name>"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139075381

I have updated tags for some of your edits via changeset/139205965
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139075381

Please provide detailed changeset comment like "added buildings in <place name>"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139125224

This building trace (way/1192841272) does not seem accurate, as it excludes staircase like segment. Unless you are familiar with the locality, it is easy to make mistakes. Map only the features that are clearly visible.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139125224

Please provide detailed changset comments to facilitate review.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139125145

Please provide detailed changeset comments to help in reviewing
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139124761

This building way/1192841273 appears too narrow compared to adjacent ones. Unless you are familiar with the area, it is easy to make mistakes if you depend only on satellite imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139124761

Please provide detailed changeset comment. For example for this changset, you could have used "added buildings in <place name>"
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139124160

Please provide detailed comments in changset like "Added buildings in --- place" for this changset to facilitate review.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139122835

Please provide detailed changeset comments instead of cryptic "z8". It may be more useful to map only buildings and leave out surrounding unconstructed plots. For this way/1192841303 a building is visible in Bing imagery, while you have flagged entire feature as grassland