highway=track usually means bicycles will have access in India. Can you elaborate why you set the access for bicycles to no?

Thanks for clarification. Your usage of hashtags is incorrect. Please check with your coordinator.

Please explain what is meant by incorrect modelling.
Please keep changsets to as close as possible to the level of a district when changing local features for ease of review. Please use hashtags=#Swiggy when uploading.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138714375

Please make changesets small geographically. For example do not combine rail network changes with road changes. Changeset comments will be more useful when changesets are geographically small and deal with only one type of features.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138704863

And one more to be corrected node/11049429080
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138581269

Can you update with URL of the changeset that reverted this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138601635

Thanks for updating.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138466266

Thanks
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138602080

Thanks for your response. Are you part of organized editing? If so can you add your oragnisation details on wiki as per osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities

The changeset contributor has deleted his account, probably as a result of reporting to DWG, when he did not respond to changeset discussions. Can you give the URL for the way/route to investigate?

Please provide changeset URL which fixes the issued raised, in your response.

Please provide the URL for the Tertiary Road. Usually tertiary roads are not unidirectional. Unless you have direct knowledge of the road and can validate with another Tertiary or Residential road which provides way for opposite direction, it may be better not to make such changes.

Can you provide the changset URL for your correction?

Which directionality is changed is not clear. Do not ignore crossing ways
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138466266

Please do not ignore the crossing ways warning where building is crossing highway.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138602080

This looks ok, if you have first hand knowledge of the location. As the poi is already existing as node cochin cement limited (8397094681), that needs to be deleted. Also as it is a factory, it would be useful if you can map the driveway road to it.

The tag wetland=marsh does not seem be suitable , based on Bing imagery. Unless you have first hand knowledge of the location, it may be better to map as natural=water and water=pond.

The way way/1190085899 is not clearly visible from the imagery specified. If you are using local knowledge or GPS trace information can you add that as source.

Naming suffixes in parenthesis may not be required unless there are places with same name in neighboring districts Check this as an example: node/11049429079

We are not using District suffix for the districts in Andhra Pradesh for example. it is similar to how a country's boundary is named. For print rendering the names need to be short as well. You may reconsider your edits in light of the above