Hey jaspinal, please review your changes. It seems you mass-edited those cycle paths. A lot of ways which should be either footway=crossings or cycleway=crossing are now falsely tagged as footway=sidewalk.

Please take more care while editing in the future and review each element one-by-one.

Hey jaspinal, please review your changes. It seems you mass-edited those cycle paths. A lot of ways which should be either footway=crossings or cycleway=crossing are now falsely tagged as footway=sidewalk.

Please take more care while editing in the future and review each element one-by-one.

I don't care which key used for the timezones in Germany, but please keep the standard time zone as well as the dst-zone.

@EvanSiroky, it seems you are not plannign to remove that historcal data, so I did it for you.

Hey EvanSiroky, OSM is not the proper location to store historical data. Please remove this relation. You might want to maintain it within OHM project.

See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/time-zone-boundaries/76086/35

Siehe:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sind-hinweise-mit-driveways-wurden-noch-nicht-eingetragen-verboten/138372/53

Danke für deinen Hinweis. Habe das Problem soeben behoben.

Hallo OMME-OSM,
gab es einen Grund die Stopposition von Node node/3002554833 zu entfernen? Bitte in Zukunft etwas vorsichtiger vorgehen bei deinen Bearbeitungen. Danke!

Hey OMME-OSM,
in dem Changeset hast du die stop_positions der Bushaltestelle der TEAG entfernt. Ich habe sie nun wieder eingetragen. Bitte dich aber, ein wenig drauf zu achten, keine Daten einfach so zu löschen. Weiterhin Happy Mappings.

Wäre super, wenn du deine Änderungen mit einer ordentliche Beschreibung versehen würdest, sodass man weiß, was du geändert hast. "Ist so" ist da wenig hilfreich. Danke.

Hey, bitte schaue doch beim nächsten Mal, wenn du Wege verbindest auch nach den Relationen. Du hast mit dem Zusammenführen der Kreisverkehre diverse Busrelationen kaputt gemacht.

Discussion continues here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/us-route-relations/122274

Thanks for the hint. I updated the areas accordingly.

route=bicycle#Members
as well just "allowing" ways in route-relations and recommends for longer routes route=bicycle#Split_routes_into_sections
the usage of superroute to combine the sections.
Read "international" in the context of the rest of the world, where a route of 1000 miles length is usually international.

You don't need superduperroute. superroute contains relations, route contains ways and nodes (aka geometry). It's not about hierarchy of different levels.

Maybe I'm misunderstand osm.wiki/Relation:route#Members

but at least as I read it, a route-relation suppose to contains ways and nodes, only the role "information" is intended for relations.

Do you have a better fit? For me village_green was the best fit.

osm.wiki/Relation:superroute
In my understanding of osm.wiki/Relation:superroute documentation and also osm.wiki/Superrelation for me superroute is a perfect fit for those relations. Also offers an easier QA as well as defined separation between the "sub-routes" and the full route.

Are you sure it's actually a roundabout? Since there are no traffic signs indicating this. There are just yield-signs. So to me it's rather on circular oneway.

Hey, I noticed you changed several tags ramps. As far as I know you can use the ramp until the toll booth with e-bikes, bicycles etc. So they should not be considered as motorway_link. Only after the toll booth, the motorway restrictions apply. Could you please double check on this and adjust your edits?