OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
85949333

You have simply used electrified=4th_rail here but the electrical system is different from pure Underground lines.

85790082

Are you sure they have gone permanently?

85721599

You have edited ways in Australia as well as the UK. Did you mean to do that?

85230736

Why?

84550786

You have followed Esri imagery, which is poorly aligned in southwest London.

83995041

Or should it have been amenity=grass?

83995041

Did you mean grass=amenity?

83634605

See also @Jason_Brown/diary/392740

83425081

Did you mean to put grass inside water?

83083550

Who asked for this change?

77442649

Welcome to OSM and keep up the good work.

72982507

What was wrong with it?

72509556

Being created with an editor that added foot=yes automatically in a preset is itself understanding why, especially when new editors were involved. I clicked through that preset in my early days and I am sure many others did too. It was wholly orthogonal to any process of tagging ways foot=designated.

72509556

When paths tagged highway=footway foot=yes were created with Potlatch 1, the tag foot=yes is likely to have come from an editor preset and is much less valuable.

70902850

Hi, I am looking into possible bugs in the iD editor. I notice that the tags on the ways you edited changed to building=yes or building=no. Was that a change you made deliberately?

68762640

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please don’t change names to block capitals; each renderer chooses how to display them.

65559491

Has the building actually been demolished?

63761515

Did you mean to delete node/5971433286/history ?

56670721

Without having gone back yet, you are probably right.

63512131

Have the roads you deleted actually been closed?