you are correct. I have edited the name and ref of the STW. Thank you for cross-checking these.

You are correct. I've edited the name and ref.

You are right, I've renamed it to Nunburnholme/No 3 STW
and corrected the ref

You are correct. My mistake. Corrected name and ref

The information I have from OFWAT and Yorkshire Water is that it's Aldfield/STW ref SAI00001615

https://www.yorkshirewater.com/environment/bioresources/

Of course, if you have better information from a site survey, please correct.

It's a new feature that a collection of charge points from the same provider has two different installations with different features at different locations on the same site. The pricing is different for the different facilities, so there needs to be some sort of obvious differentiation here. Yes. They probably should have more tags, which I'll get around to doing once I've further researched.

Ground truth is always the best. What does the sign on the gate say?
The reports the EU for the Wastewater treatment directive have came from the water companies and are should be reasonably accurate up to 2018.

Current Bing imagery of this area appears to be well aligned with nearby features from multiple data sources, GPX and other suitably-licenced maps.

Having looked at other GPS traces in the system, it looks like the current alignment is in the middle of the logged GPX tracks. As and when we get more data (GPX and imagery), we could perhaps improve it further.

fixed

yes, fixed.

feel free to revert it; I'll leave you to it. Don't want to trample on your good work. Good luck.

Ground truth rule applies. If the sign on the ground proclaims that the area is known as Beesworth, then it sort of is; If not, what's the residential development actually called, and where's the ground truth for that name?

Reverted. operator has been set to Waitrose & Partners.

There's some cases of franchised branches at some motorway service areas where the Waitrose is actually operator=Welcome Break

Thank you for highlighting. It is indeed, a private road, but on taking a closer look at it today, access=permissive seems more suitable, since the Hertfordshire Way does indeed go this way.

It's the description from the Road Traffic Act Regulation Act notice. Given that it's not the public highway, it probably doesn't legally need a name, but it needed some way of being legally identified. If you can find a better name for it, feel free to set the current name as an 'alt_name' tag and change the name tag.

OS Locator has the apostrophe.
The original meaning of the Queen's Bower locality is named after Queen Elizabeth I.
http://www.ravensheadnewsletter.co.uk/history.htm
If it's named after a particular queen, and it's a bower (a pleasant shady place under trees or climbing plants in a garden or wood), then the apostrophe is possessive. Therefore the correct English spelling of it has the apostrophe.
Having name:en being the correct English language of it, and name tag being whatever it says on the road sign means that searches by name will work, regardless of punctuation.

If you must edit this, then at least ensure that there is an alternate name with the correct apostrophe in there.

I tried to reply to the email, which may not have got through. It was very approximately from a developer's sales brochure. Full survey via GPS or newer imagery welcome.

done

My thoughts are that the speed limit WILL change soon, and all the software I know that uses speed limit data uses a transformed copy of planet.osm, which isn't refreshed often, so when lowering speed limits, it's probably safer to update sooner than later (so that it actually gets to the intended users in time). If someone is inconvenienced in the next few days, feel free to revert, and then revert back when the signs go up next week.