Kāpēc jūs noņēmāt manu pareizo rediģēšanu un pievienojāt vecos objhects, kas neeksistē?

OSM dati ir paredzēti ne tikai "13 tonnu smagam atkritumvedējam", bet arī vieglajiem automobiļiem, velosipēdiem un gājējiem. Ir tagi, kas attiecas uz kravas automobiļiem hgv=*

I agree on micromapped subitems if they are part of something bigger like picnic_site or camp_site, but if place itself is just picnic table, that's really strange. But ok, I will follow your interpretation

All tourism=picnic_table? I was checking photos VMU added, some sites have just picnic tables like this one
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=83e45ea188b24dbf926acd8aac768d4d

Those were from 2020 data of VMU, there was just one that had marks that it doesn't exist. Others I believe were not new in OSM

It's a bit strange that places were created in 2022 in OSM, but in arcgis new names are for places that were created in 2020 in arcgis.

Hi! What is the source of data for picnic sites?
I found
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=83e45ea188b24dbf926acd8aac768d4d

Data there is from 2020, some names are different and phone numbers also

Es atgriezu, Nepamanīju :)

Paldies! Nejauši salauzu :)

Čau! Tagad vairs nav tikai pa tiltu :)

What was destroyed? I though i have restored all route relations. What's missing? Or you prefer to keep construction ways together with existing ones?

way/1182403926 not sidewalk!

What was the problem with name=? why have you changed it to description= It's the official name from LVM data

node/3657970395

Don't break route relations!!!

Don't break route relations!!!

When making changes don't break route relations!!!

Don't merge roads when they are part of "route" relation!!!