Hello. Please have a look at the local as well as the general mapping conventions for road classifications. None of the roads that you upgraded to primary and trunk seem to meet the definitions.

Also please have a look at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Sarangani is hundreds of kilometers away from the edits in this changeset and "Waypoint" does not describe well the huge amount of changes to well established road classifications that you made.

Good day gillhsu. The road link that you added (way/929553066) does not exist. Please only connect roads when they're clearly visible on aerial imagery. As for way/929553067, this would be better tagged as service than unclassified. There are detailled descriptions of all highway tags on the OSM wiki. Happy mapping!

Good day yuehtsai, please always make sure to download all the existing data in an area before adding new roads. This way you will avoid adding duplicates of roads that already exist in the database. Also please have a look at the definitions of motorway and residential roads. I've reverted this changeset.

Thank you for reassessing this. Keep up the good work!

Thank you for having another look. Keep up the good work!

Hello. What is your source for the separated lanes at way/542743944? I've passed by this road many times and there is no such separation. This can also clearly be seen on aerial imagery. and strava heatmaps.

Hello Dolf. You might have missed the second part of the trunk definition: "Continuous stretch of highway between large cities (population 100,000+)" ;)

Good day HikkaduwaBeach. What guidelines are you using for deciding on road classifications? It seems that the previous classification of the roads leading to the municipalities of Tarangnan and Pagsanghan were in accordance with the local mapping conventions.

Good day Raenbow. For entrances and exits to underground or multi storey parking facilities there's the more specific tag amenity=parking_entrance. Thank you.

Hello AntelopeCliif. It is difficult to assess road classifications from aerial imagery alone, even more so if roads are barely visible due to high building density. Please always check way histories. Many of the previous classifications were based on ground surveys.

Good day RockCreekPark. Naujan is a major municipality with more than 100'000 inhabitants. It seems that the previous classification of this road was in accordance with the local mapping conventions.

Good evening. What source are these numbers based on? Only numbers assigned by DPWH should be used with ref tag on roads.

Hello again. Which bank in Sirib? Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
Also please only add road names that are either found on signage or that are commonly used. I know Tagakpan very well and I really don't think anybody is using the road Falcata - Manambulan Road for the road leading to Naming.

Hello sveeb. What would you like to have updated about bukidnon road? Also please read the conventions that the community has for road classifications (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions). For example the roads connecting Magkuno to the highway are very minor roads in comparison to the existing tertiary roads connecting from Crossing Quarry and Crossing 20 to Angalan/Balengaeng.

Hello superwaih, please make sure to download all the existing data in an area before adding new objects to avoid duplications. And please check the OSM road classification guidelines, those road that you tagged as tertiary and primary are all just residentials. Thank you.

Good day BidasoaRiver of course, sorry for the mix-up.

Good day FluteButte. In accordance with the "One feature, one OSM element principle" it seems to be preferable not to add ford=yes on a node if the tag is already found on the respective way. Otherwise the ford will be rendered twice (see node/8443498680). Also by changing this ford from track to unclassified you removed the important information that this is a natural riverbed and not a road. Adding the tags surface=ground and smoothness=horrible might be an appropriate alternative to tagging it as track.

Good day FluteButte. In accordance with the "One feature, one OSM element principle" it seems to be preferable not to add ford=yes on a node if the tag is already found on the respective way. Otherwise the ford will be rendered twice. Thanks and keep up the good work!

Also I'm curious from where you know the location of all of these points of interests. Are you doing on the ground surveys? Or are you copying from another database?

Good evening Darryl. This gas station already existed. Same with the nearby Varsity Inn. Please be more careful to avoid duplicates like these. And also please read this wiki article about changeset comments: [osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments]