OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

SomeoneElse's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by SomeoneElse

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
4264694 SomeoneElseSC

Another one

via StreetComplete 57.3

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/214904.jpg
1910565 SomeoneElse

(This note has been re-created from old note #1429484)
--------------------------
MatWay on 2018-06-18 07:43:22 UTC:
40 вниз

via StreetComplete 5.2
--------------------------
(anonymous comment removed)

4274664 SomeoneElseSC

Desmond Family Canoe Trail

via StreetComplete 57.3

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/216140.jpg
4274665 SomeoneElseSC

Nearly half way there

via StreetComplete 57.3

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/216141.jpg
4274688 SomeoneElseSC

Half way

via StreetComplete 57.3

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/216143.jpg
4274703 SomeoneElseSC

over half way

via StreetComplete 57.3

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/216144.jpg
3286566 SomeoneElse

How does the Thames Path (northern bank) connect here? relation/9480766#map=19/51.46188/-0.31711
Presumably you don't need to cross the river and back again?
420407 SomeoneElse

What does sac_scale=yes on way/27394075 mean?
3250032 SomeoneElse

way/1047595813/history (a separately-mapped sidewalk) in Sudbury has been deleted. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122809694 for the change.
Previously, the St Edmund Way ran along it: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jCQ , and now there's a gap: relation/358939#map=17/52.03747/0.72995 .

See also comment at changeset/122809694 .

Should the separately mapped sidewalk be reinstated or should the relation run along the main road?
4031959 eteb3

This industrial building seems badly labelled?