This account, called "SLAVA_UKRAINI" made one changeset before it was deleted (presumably at their own request).

Thanks

Bonjour hugo82,
S'il vous plaît, ne changez pas les niveaux d'administration comme celui-ci sans discussion au niveau international. Qu'est-ce qui vous fait penser que l'Abkhazie a le même niveau de reconnaissance internationale que le Kosovo,
Meilleures salutations,
Andy

Hello hugo82,
Please don't change admin levels like this without discussion internationally. What makes you think that Abkhazia has the same level of international recognition that Kosovo has,
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks again.

Great - thanks.

In case you're wondering how I noticed, @SomeoneElse/diary/397310 explains it - the number of pieces of this part of NCN1 went up by 1.

Thanks

> "Beaufort Sea" does appear in CGNDB

It'd be good to have a look at it - where is that available?

Hello,
Just wondered if the bridleway no longer reaches the car park, as the gap in NCN1 suggests: relation/9579#map=18/55.30812/-1.55749 ?
Best Regards,
Andy

Does CanVec have a name on a map (the equivalent of an OSM node) or the explicit area you have drawn?

Hello,
Can you explain in what way you thought that the previous Beaufort Sea node was "redundant"? Can you explain what your source for relation/13899391/history in changeset/118179500 . That changeset lists sources of "Existing OSM data; CanVec; CGNDB"; can you explain how CanVec or CGNDB defines exactly relation/13899391/history , and where you discussed this project with other Canadian mappers?
Best Regards,
Andy

This is a continuation of the previous changeset, "Footpaths etc. near Ampleforth, from survey 9/2/2022, tr8553b".

(re boundaries) I've long since given up understanding what boundaries are mapped in Ireland (either side of the border), but I saw these versions disappear so I thought that I'd better mention it :)

(re messages) you should get everyone else's messages but not your own. Maybe check the email address you have registered at osm.org (or your spam box?).

I got the message ...

For completeness, done at https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/commit/0442a7290af58b7ed5b8fcb24ba46f99ab1b5a36 and https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/openstreetmap-carto-AJT/commit/a6c4437088d555b1bb3a90353bf2df559e607d4e ; will appear at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html at next reload.

No response at changeset/117922060 after 5 days - do you want to try and contact @Boggedy some other way, or want to revert, or want me to revert?
Best Regards,
Andy

The discussion on talk-gb seemed to suggest that in this particular case these _are_ signed as cycleways, no matter how bonkers that sign placement actually is, so "cycleway" is actually correct here.

J'ai suggéré à la personne qui s'est plainte au DWG qu'il serait bon qu'elle essaie de contacter ce mappeur, mais elle ne l'a pas fait.
Malgré cela, les données semblent assez improbables, je vais donc les supprimer.

I did suggest that the person who complained to the DWG that it would be good if they tried to contact this mapper, but they didn't.
Notwithstanding that, the data looks pretty unlikely, so I'll remove it.