RaphaelPasloin's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by RaphaelPasloin
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5089342 | Thierry1030 | https://www.citydev.brussels/nl/nieuws/canalcity-anderlecht-ons-9de-kmo-park
|
|||
| 3884518 | il y a une Chapelle Calvaire quelque part ici près de la piste cyclable. |
||||
| 5194355 | RaphaelPasloin | only bicycle can pass here now : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=950367814223413 Problem : Chaussée deBoitsfort is suposed to be oneway Last Mapillary 2025 don't show if it's all 2 way or just a part #surveyneeded (Avenue des Coccinelles) |
|||
| 5254339 | Kauwberg | "ce chemin n'existe plus. c'est une zone sauvage"
|
|||
| 5270911 | RaphaelPasloin | Wolvendael and Carsoel : 04 Mai 2026 : maxspeed=30 km/h (CC Décember 2025) |
|||
| 5278099 | RaphaelPasloin | Service road is disconnected from the main road (or if it's desired the way should be a pedestrian) , + gate is a little offset , sidewalk is drawed on the edge of the road. |
|||
| 5274870 | RaphaelPasloin | way/30178958 Landuse=residential Any reason to justify the layer=-1 on the landuse , history don't give a explanation (appart the yoyo edit) |
|||
| 5275048 | RaphaelPasloin | There is a tunnel inside a tunnel here (rail) The tunnel is signed on the pin and on the exit at Vivier d'Oie and it's not Tunnel du Vivier d'Oie ... (spoted this week on L26 train) Tunnel Bois de la Cambre - Tunnel Terkamerenbos (not sure if it's signed in 1 word or 2 word in nl Ter Kammerenbos) So v1 of wikidata wast mostly correct until same user decide to change it ... Unfurtunaly i haven't found picture of this signage, and you need to be lucky to catch all 2 signs as it's in fr in one side and in nl in other side (in each entrance) or doing AR beetween the 2 stations and making a video. There is probably some cab view of l26 on internet to catch it. |
|||
| 5273150 | RaphaelPasloin | Construction of platform is finished, elevator in function, all accessible but no train stoping yet. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1486152059669036 For the 2 tracks under "construction" that raise validation issue : in fact there is only the "pile" of the bridge for the future platform constructed and no sign of construction of track : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1627126181875863 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1536245731176712 so footway crossing track are not bridge , they make a "remblai" to pout them on it. I think it's linked on the multiple appeal on the councyl of the state. Existing track in use are re numbered 5 and 6 (see track ref for position) + add zone:Brupass=1 on the station. |
|||
| 4041941 | RaphaelPasloin | way/1233514964 is realy suspicious. On previous research i made the culvert going to a collector in Berboets note/4014153 but Vivaqua should disconect it and make a new culvert but not found a lot info about it. (more research needed for this part). No official data available for the nord part , so maybe it's simply still go to the collector in Bervoet or theres is a new culvert going to the nord but in any case the relief here don't allow the stream going up to the east ... (i suspect user draw v1 in order to connect on patinage on guessing completly how ...) |