any chance you know (or can update) the trail visibility? I only see maybe a small section visible from satellite, and nothing obvious shows up on strava or 3dep.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172964652

looks like this is already tagged on the building - see way/1427236740 ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172082933

it looks like some of these are duplicates of existing toilets - can you confirm? here's an example node/13166941738#map=19/37.874328/-119.353428&layers=N
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172372725

it is helpful when the change description is more descriptive - a summary of what has been changed. this aids the community when reviewing. please consider this in the future, thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171749142

was the weighbridge tag added here intentional? way/996657748/history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171899484

looks like there there are two relations - see relation/16264390 and relation/16110926 . can you take a look?

no problem at all, just update the hours and upload - the same process you followed for this change - they are immediately published.

reviews are after the fact and best effort by the community. I have a feed setup in osmcha for changes in Kings Canyon and usually take a peek within a few days or weeks. others do something similar.

anyhow welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution :-)

are the hours correct on the Grant Grove Visitor center? the website says 8-5 in the summer https://www.nps.gov/seki/planyourvisit/visitorcenters.htm
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171144386

Hi, welcome to OSM. Aside from adding comments or sending a message there isn’t a way of suggesting a change- when you change the map it takes effect immediately.

Applications that use the OSM database typically update much less often. It will take weeks to months (or sometimes years) for a small change like this to get propagated everywhere. For example Caltopo does an update 2-4 times a year. Gaia used to do it every couple weeks but has slowed down significantly. So be patient.

Generally speaking it is often better to use access tags (like access=no) and lifecycle prefixes (closed:highway=path) to prevent a way from being used and showing up on a map. In this case deleting it is probably fine though but a discussion on the original changeset changeset/59557696 would have been a good place to start. The author has been working on tagging climbing routes and is pretty active.

Thanks again for the contribution and let me know if I can help with mapping trails around the park

are these ranks defined somewhere?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170797500

if this alternate isn't an official trail (like a ducked route around snow) please add informal=yes and a sac_scale= (if suitable). thanks for the update!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170503642

for meadow restoration consider using the `closed:highway` lifecycle prefix and/or tagging access=no. the old trail will show up on satellite and gps heatmaps for many years and often get mapped as new trails again and again when they are deleted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170587849

hi! the trail updates look to be a bit further off than the current Strava heatmap + 3DEP LiDAR data implies. was there an issue on the ground with the existing path? satellite is often misaligned around this part of the park
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170637090

if the distinction matters, these are often used for days or more as a base camp for day rides, and subjectively much less often (if at all) as a temporary overnight stop on a longer packing trip.

the ones I am familiar with are normal car camping campgrounds with paddocks in the vicinity. there are more of these in Inyo NF too.

maybe a camp_site=stock tag would be appropriate? there has been some effort to standardize on this key for different types of camps

I made an attempt to clean up the relation and associated way tags. This is a common problem around here.

this tool doesn't work properly for waterway relations, e.g. relation/14901375 should have gotten the wikidata tag instead of way/291349401 and Mine Creek was already tagged relation/16718618.

it would be awesome if the tool could be fixed to deal with river and stream relations
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169178489

thanks for the contribution - a couple suggestions: access=no will exclude horses (and bicycles). removing access= and adding vehicle=no might be better here.

consider adding barrier=debris (or another barrier= value) to a node where the dozer pile is located
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167597224

until trails disappear from most recent satellite imagery and gpx heatmaps it is usually better to use the access tags or a closed: lifecycle prefix on the highway tag. in Yosemite it is pretty common for deleted paths to come back to life by helpful armchair mappers.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167501705

looks like this inadvertently tagged all of Mariposa as a swimming pool way/33207307