these are not link roads nor secondary, please read osm.wiki/Highway_link and highway=unclassified

trail updates around the GTW and eastern Sequoia, added bridge details, Volcano Falls and a few more buildings

if it's a name that would be used on an mailing address then `name` is fine... otherwise I'd use `loc_name` or maybe `alt_name` depending on how common it is. just something like `loc_name=The Four Lane` without quotes should be good. the road number is pulled from the `ref` tag so you don't need to add it again

when a creek runs under a road add a culvert to the creek instead of creating a bridge on the road. unless there really is a bridge.

there is no need to add the number of lanes to the road name. the lanes=4 tag already covers this. thanks!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134635084

are the marked ford=yes nodes actually fords? the NHD flowlines around the Sierras are not super accurate, and most (say 95-99%) of the notable ones have culverts or bridges
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134434061

grocery stores need not be added to hiking routes, even if they are nearby. take a look at osm.wiki/Hiking#Roles for common hiking relation roles.

No worries, just saw these pop up in Osmose. can you take a look and connect or delete them? There may be others too: way/924857015 way/924857036 way/924857009 way/924857033
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132234287

this change deleted a lot of tracks and left some orphaned/disconnected. was this intentional?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132234287

I double checked in Secor and the UTM location can point to either one but the description makes it sound like the way you have it mapped is correct:

"The south side of the pass consists of slabs that lead to the northern base of Matthes Crest."

Secor describes Wilts Col as being directly between peak 7 and 8, where Echo Pass (currently) located. do you think Wilts Col and Echo Pass are one and the same?

should be fixed by changeset/129662865#map=15/37.8349/-119.8433

this broke the Yosemite Wilderness relation
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126157758

did you also modify the existing canyon?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128953724

minor nit but consider adding bridge=boardwalk for the boardwalk bridge=boardwalk
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126795363

the problem in this area is mostly due to NHD flowlines imported as waterways. many (most?) of these should be deleted but it's a ton of work to clean up an area. Yosemite is much better than Inyo NF in this regard.

the 1994 USGS quads are a better reference for waterways, they're not always correct but they're pretty good. in this case there is no waterway on the USGS quad. the trail however does get wet... just no running or standing water to deal with, at least in my experience.

the times I've been through this section of trail, even in wet years like 2017 and 2019, this was definitely not a ford... but I haven't been back in a while. has this changed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124463048

these two segments were part of different relations - one for the JMT and a second for the PCT. combining the two segments breaks the PCT relation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124462927

I know there are campsites in the vicinity but they’re almost certainly not named Test, can you fix this?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124329185

looks like you just deleted a node, not the way. did you intend to whack the whole thing or just the lower half?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123451505

that sounds normal, the cabins are put up for the summer only. pretty much just a canvas tent with a temporary floor on the permanent foundation.