OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
125956633

Hello.
Please note that name tag is a not a category or a description.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125956633

125956687

Hello.
What is the source of this data?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125956687

125956777

Hello.
What is the source of this data?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125956777

125947112

Hello.
If it's a driveway, why delete it rather than fix tags to indicate that it's a driveway?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125947112

125864304

Hello.
Could you please elaborate where all these names are coming from?

125864304

Hello.
Could you please elaborate where all these names are coming from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125864304

125790652

name= tag looks incomplete?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125790652

125769517

What maps this tag is not showing up on?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125769517

125759960

Hello.
I noticed that you used Maxar imagery to map these features. Please note that version of it is rather low resolution and not perfectly aligned. In this area you are better off using Bing imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125759960

125757066

Hello.
Do you have more information about some of these biz, like address, phone number, website, etc?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125757066

125295265

Hello.
When mapping crosswalks, please don't forget to connect crosswalk to the relevant road. :)
Also, crosswalks controlled by traffic lights should be tagged as crossing=traffic_signals
While crossing=marked is intended for "STOP" crosswalks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125295265

125250423

You are correct, I shouldn't have said "invalid".I was thinking of uri= tag instead.
Nonetheless, url= tag is more ambiguous. It's better suited as a suffix tag.

125250423

On that page it states: "it is advised not to use this tag when more specific alternatives are available such as website=* or contact:website=*, image=*, wikipedia=* and so on."

125251414

Hello.
When updating bus stops and citibike stations, please check that their street names are fully spelled out, ie instead of "E 57 St" it's "East 57th Street".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125251414

125250981

🔵👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125250981

125231788

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what's the purpose of creating relation/14486564?
In relation/14486566, wouldn't it make sense to expand "GCT" in the name tag?(and if necessary add short_name tag?)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125231788

125213743

Hello.
Please note that "url=" is not a valid tag. What you want is "website=". 👍

125213117

Hello.
In relation/14484596, it seems like alt_name= is more appropriate as operator= ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125213117

125208729

What you could do is draw an alignment circle, snap relevant nodes to it and then delete that alignment circle. 😉
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125208729

125156912

👍
But please don't map steps along their width the way I've seen elsewhere in the area. That's also incorrect.