Bom dia.

Porque é que "Parada de Ester e Ester"(relation/6338940) faz parte do concelho de "São Pedro do Sul"(relation/5330331 também)? Não deveria fazer parte apenas do concelho de "Castro Daire"(relation/5329283)? Creio que não houve mudança administrativa nesse sentido, certo? Se não houve, o que motiva tal mudança no OSM?

Obrigado!

Hi. I'd like to ask what province does Yongqu(City) belong to? Does it belong to Tibet or to Qinghai?
Thank you.

Hi. Is there a claim by Qinghai over this place(relation/8242781)? Does this place belong to Tibet but a part is in Qinghai?

Já foi construída casa neste espaço, peço que adicionem, p. favor. Obrigado.

The borders of this element(relation/128576) are incorrect here. They should be fixed to match the parent administrative element or at least the state borders. If the state borders are the ones being incorrect then they should be fixed.

The borders of this object(relation/129590) are incorrect here. They should be fixed to match the adminLevel-1 or at least the state borders.

Why is this element a subelement of another when it is not a subarea of it:
Saint-Nazaire (18349)
Céret (2767883)

relation/18349#map=13/42.6491/3.0632
relation/2767883#map=13/42.6491/3.0632

Additionally, Saint-Nazaire doesn't count on the list of communes of Céret:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/fr:Arrondissement%20de%20C%C3%A9ret?uselang=en

Bom dia. Esta relação(relation/17140991) não pode ser administrativa, para isso tem de ter um objeto fechado, mas apenas tem um único elemento(way/209145305). Por favor corrija. Obrigado!

Hola. Cuál es el nombre de este objeto administrativo?
Gracias.

The borders of this element(relation/13839742 - Heipa District) seem incorrect. Is it supposed to go beyond state borders into North Dakota? If not they should be fixed to match the parent administrative element or at least the state borders. If the borders of the parent elements are incorrect then they should be fixed instead.