OpenStreetMap
Mikey Co's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by Mikey Co
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5260033 | TheUKHighStreet | node/12723541368
|
|||
| 4532355 | SammyTheSnake | Not a risk, but a small footpath! via StreetComplete 59.3 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4533547 | SammyTheSnake | This road does not exist via StreetComplete 59.3 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4310639 | DorneyLake123 | is this track heading north east actually a service road accessible to cars? |
|||
| 4310637 | DorneyLake123 | why is this track tagged as foot=no? is it explicitly prohibited? bucks council footpath layers would make sense if this road is accessible |
|||
| 4310643 | DorneyLake123 | how does this footpath cross the railway? tunnel? |
|||
| 4417607 | Mikey Co | I've marked this pub as closed (disused:amenity=pub) but it will reopen at some stage |
|||
| 4751405 | Mikey Co | Like note #4751403, this is another footpath issue in the area. This path definitely doesn't exist here, though it's easy enough to continue SW to pick up the track going NW |
|||
| 4751403 | Mikey Co | I was politely told by a woman tending to some horses, that this footpath didn't exist as it crossed a field with horses. I didn't argue the case, but am dubious about this. One more thing to add to my list of issues to raise with the Herts RoW department. |
|||
| 4751773 | Mikey Co | I didn't see a footbridge here, but the aerial photos suggest there might be something here? |
