MikeN's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 130083005 | Hi, this road appears to be privately owned, but not gated and therefore not privately accessed. Bing streetview also does not show a no-trespassing sign. It had been previously created as a 'residential' road. It should be changed to type service / driveway and the 'private' attribute removed. The neighboring driveway's private access should also be removed - in the past too many were marked as private in a confusion over private ownership and private access. |
|
| 130081299 | Welcome to OSM! This is the correct use of the access private tag since it is gated. |
|
| 130074526 | Hi, Normally the address point is placed on the residence at the end of the driveway instead of the middle of the road. Amazon uses this to assist with delivery. |
|
| 128787061 | Hi, some POIs are added to the outline rather than as a node. The POIs in this changeset duplicate the businesses already on the building outlines. |
|
| 128782902 | Hi, welcome to OSM! Buildings are aligned with the base of the building rather than the roof. This is so the position of the walls is most accurate since the aerial photo may have been taken from an angle. Also, although the OSM term apartments applies to current usage, a building built as a church will always be building type church (such as the pink building down the street). |
|
| 128635409 | Restored in changeset/128695492 |
|
| 128635409 | Hi, thank you for this edit. The saddle point really exists, as shown on the Topo imagery. Why was it removed? |
|
| 128231397 | I have no strong opinion on this, but the trend in OSM classification is toward connectivity rather than lanes, traffic counts, width, etc. That would tend to move them toward tertiary. |
|
| 128262422 | This is a good edit, but the map program taking a shortcut through the traffic light has a big oversight if they treat the ramp and light as zero routing cost. Magic Earth and Osmand route as expected. |
|
| 126843395 | It looks like US 81 was duplicated, for example this stop sign is in the middle of Lake Ellsworth. node/10065537792 |
|
| 127861653 | Hi, Thank you for the city boundary update! The change looks good because I didn't see any shared boundaries. The old boundary relation and ways can be removed. It is generally better to edit objects rather than remove-replace, especially boundaries with shared edges. For those cases the "Replace Geometry" function would apply to each revised way, possibly after un-snapping old boundaries from roads, etc, then making sure they reconnect or share other existing boundaries. |
|
| 127754986 | Hi, what was the source of the name here? |
|
| 125205663 | Welcome to OSM! Why was the driveway removed? |
|
| 123586202 | Welcome to OSM! Please use meaningful changeset comments - "stuff" does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
|
| 123294379 | Thanks for the update - the lifecycle tag should include the former key also: abandoned:aeroway for this example. I have updated the abandoned features here. |
|
| 123062229 | Hi, the abandoned runway is probably best modeled with the lifecycle prefix so that it cannot be mistaken for a real runway. abandoned=*: |
|
| 122861535 | Hi, I believe TIGER is wrong here - the Greenville County GIS shows both the road and house addresses as just 'Packridge'. While GIS might be in error, the sign shows the same thing on Bing Streetview. |
|
| 122701228 | I would also like to have seen a less urgent note with more detail on first contact. But somehow there are duplicate ways such as way/1072223214 . I'm wondering if the upload happened at the exact instant of one of the network shutdowns or the DB re-index of a few days ago. I have also seen something like this with an edit conflict but don't know how it happened. |
|
| 122742400 | Oops, my mistake - this edit is correct. Thank you. |
|
| 122742400 | Hi, what was the source for this change? ESRI (Clarity) shows the road close to TIGER, and nothing different shows on newer imagery. |