What was the reason for changing these road classification? It seems to be a different method than other local editors have used.

I wasn't involved in the earlier complaints, but I agree with this revert and the mechanical edit rules. (even though I would personally want an editor flag that automatically removes 'source' on any edit I touch).

Welcome to OSM! The node at node/3779137058 was accidentally dragged. The editor has an Undo arrow in the upper right corner that can restore things if they are accidentally moved. Would you like me to fix this?

I restored the building and marked it as type of office. It might be OK to add the building name such as rental office or club house; I'm not sure what its official name is.

Thank you for this edit. What was the intended change? It removed the building tag on the main office building and replaced it with landuse. The entire complex was already marked as 'Millenium Apartment Homes'.

These are fictional edits - please stop vandalizing the map, which many people are using

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! You're doing a great job adding local features. The subdivision tagging has evolved in the US. The most common method is to draw the residential land use outline, then add the name to the outline. If there is an original GNIS tag, it may be removed. The place tag is no longer used for subdivisions, as these are not a traditional hamlet.

What specifically do you see that seems to be poor quality? From what I can see, it matches and exceeds quality I see from primary GIS sources.

I must be missing something, this looks like high quality work.

Welcome to OSM. What is the source of this data?

Please use meaningful changeset comments
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

By the way, welcome to OSM! I corrected the node. Let me know if you have any questions.

Hi, Please be careful when moving around the map. In this changeset, you dragged a node for hundreds of meters and disrupted a street shape.

Thanks for redrawing this! I'm OK with deleting as part of an improvement project. After looking at the old wood boundary, it probably did need to be drawn with more detail.

What was incorrect about the woods that had to be removed? They were not an import but handcrafted in the old world tradition.

Hi, these crossings do not look like a Ford where the road is under water - it should be a culvert. node/109660772

I understood the building=detached to be primarily single family dwelling. I'm not familiar with WISEM, but it doesn't seem to match. building=detached

Hi, Thank you for this edit. The building marked is actually the corporate shelter, not the amphitheatre which is located at node/666467876

Hi, does this portion of Bear Rock Road really not exist, or is there just a barrier?
Also, a previous user placed a barrier on Pinnacle Mountain Road, which doesn't show in Bing Streetview.

I am also an 'outsider'. I prefer some types of automated data sources as a starting point. I have worked with traditional handcrafted OSM land uses (not created by me), as it is necessary to modify for landscape changes. Here I looked in several random areas of the county comparing several imagery sources which should span about 8 years. I would find it very disorienting to try to correlate this set of land uses to any of the imagery. I admit my first step would probably be the same as frustrated users took with the land use tagging in the state of Georgia: remove and start over.

Please don't delete sections of the lake: the entire reservoir has disappeared.