Hi, please please submit descriptive change messages, it really helps when reviewing changes.

I see these building are not visible on the satellite view, have they been removed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121645554

In this case I think the disused tags shoudl be used, the name of the building doesn't include (closed) so that doesn't belong there. disused=*:
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121116676

I assume the house number is also still valid so the tag addr:housenumber= could also be set?

Welcome to OSM, thanks for your contributions. Please use descriptive change logs in commits instead of "Update" as it makes it much easier to review changes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121116815

Thank you for your contribution, however can you please try and input descriptive change descriptions instead of "fssff" as it makes reviewing changes easier.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120716102

Thanks for you addition, just to let you know I have swapped your node with an area but there was nothing wrong with the way you mapped.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119631097

What is going on with ways 986574924 and 986574927 there are sidewalks here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116961597

It looks like you have combined changes in Ashford and Dover, try and keep changes localised.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116069912

"Cyclist dismount" signs have no meaning in UK law. If there is no end cycle lane sign in theory the path continues past the cyclists dismount sign.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114891338

Thanks for the fix.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113177025

Looks like there is already a node for this, but I think this should probably be on a relationship not a node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113173094

This area is currently under redevelopment so not worth putting too much time into it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109198658

Did you validate this on the ground, there (at least used to) exist a set of stairs to a pavement on the side you have deleted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109013136

I am still learning too.I don't think it's super clear cut when a road is a service road or driveway.

would it make sense for this to be tagged as a driveway not a service road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102533384

Yeah I also didn't notice first time that this land use area also covered knights park.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101521051

Ace thanks, still trying to learn the conventions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101521051

This seems to go against what the wiki says for this tag landuse=residential that housing estates can/should have names on residential tags.

Is there a place tag already in place, as this change just seems to be removing information?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101521051

In iD editor you can use the shortcut q to make areas square
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100954673

Thanks for the fix.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100525346