OpenStreetMap
Mex's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 113173094 | Looks like there is already a node for this, but I think this should probably be on a relationship not a node.
|
|
| 109198658 | This area is currently under redevelopment so not worth putting too much time into it.
|
|
| 109013136 | Did you validate this on the ground, there (at least used to) exist a set of stairs to a pavement on the side you have deleted.
|
|
| 102533384 | I am still learning too.I don't think it's super clear cut when a road is a service road or driveway. |
|
| 102533384 | would it make sense for this to be tagged as a driveway not a service road?
|
|
| 101521051 | Yeah I also didn't notice first time that this land use area also covered knights park.
|
|
| 101521051 | Ace thanks, still trying to learn the conventions.
|
|
| 101521051 | This seems to go against what the wiki says for this tag landuse=residential that housing estates can/should have names on residential tags. Is there a place tag already in place, as this change just seems to be removing information?
|
|
| 100954673 | In iD editor you can use the shortcut q to make areas square
|
|
| 100525346 | Thanks for the fix.
|
|
| 100491984 | Should this be removed, or should the disused tagging be used instead until it's new usage has been confirmed?
|
|
| 100374281 | Hi could these names not be moved to the correct prow_ref field?
|
|
| 98691145 | Should this be a driveway?
|
|
| 98642951 | Should this be a driveway?
|
|
| 98440315 | My goal is to get all of ashford's buildings done by the end of the year, finished the buildings below the railway (mostly) last year. So every little helps.
|
|
| 98440315 | Nice to see someone else drawing in houses in Ashford. :)
|
|
| 97761453 | Thanks, this was probably me, still getting used to JOSM.
|
|
| 97259880 | Thanks for the info.
|
|
| 97251496 | Cool. I'll keep an eye out for details to add then. :)
|
|
| 97259880 | Do we use the tag kindergarten in the UK? I found the wiki on this not very clear.
|