Bing is not perfectly geo alined, you might find you are makign things more wrong by trying to align to sat image without correction.

Are you realigning the sat image to a know good source such as the cadastral parcels?

Square up is bound to the shortcut q in the id editor. Hit ? For the full list.

Additonally please don't use the 'name' field for address numbers, these should only be included in the addr:housenumber tag

Thank you for attempting to align the buildings. Please user the "Square corners of a line or area" tools where possible (Q in iD) to ensure building shapes are squared off.

Can you also explain why you have removed valid building, the garages, in this commit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155600626

Looks like it's attributed to me but came from an existing node being merged into the area https://osmcha.org/changesets/149490359

this doesn't look to match any route visible on the sat image.

if your using the ID editor you can use the 'q' shortcut to help square up buildings.

no problem, hopefully the changes match what you wanted.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147247405

whilst deleting the object is not incorrect as the building is still visible on the satalite layers using the lifecycle tags might be better to prevent it being re-added. demolished:=**
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147107770

Hi. Thanks for you contributions, but can you please supply a descriptive changelog comment rather than "."
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146330053

Please provide descriptive messages in your change logs to help those reviewing changes.

landuse tags used, have switched to building tags, landuse would be used for the plot the flats are on.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144750465

looks good, but try and use the square up feature (q shortcut in ID) to make your building have nice square corners.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144669030

Just a heads up that pavements are not usually mapped as seperate in Ashford unless there is a verge between them and the road. It's not "wrong" to map them as seperate but you might hear some noise about it from people.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143476022

What is this round way you have added? This doesn't seem to match the satellite images.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137802810

Looks like you have deleted the building tag of this building, I don't think that's correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137747845

Not sure on your tagging on this one, I would expect tags such as the Lifecyle disused:amenity and name:old
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137373872

Is this node you have added for the valiant Sailor?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134137820

thanks for the fix, don't sure how did that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133990213

Thanks, not sure why I put new in the tag there.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133582299