OpenStreetMap
Mapper32:0's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by Mapper32:0
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2657990 | Mapper32:0 | I suspect the end of Path #940169717 (above, new) is also the correct route for the end of #474467665 (below) |
|||
| 1522685 | Not sure why this "footway" ends here. Either it shouldn't be here at all or it should show the full route through the shopping centre. |
||||
| 1524142 | (very approximate position) - there is a break in the wall here with a path into the housing to the North |
||||
| 2198142 | I think this is where the unmapped path in the note to the east (#1524142) starts. |
||||
| 2590576 | New signed public cyclepath from here, heading WSW, skirting along edge of forest. |
||||
| 2648378 | Mapper32:0 | path mentioned in #2590576 joins here. I will trace it sometime. |
|||
| 2203310 | Mapper32:0 | This area (without tree's) is tidal. The 'causeway' to the right is also completely underwater by high tide. I don't yet know how to map this properly. |
|||
| 2203943 | New road, Kirkton Road missing |
||||
| 2202708 | Mapper32:0 | This is not a pier. I'm not sure how best to map a tower with a connecting bridge. CC licensed image https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2700994 |
|||
| 2202701 | Mapper32:0 | I have crossed this stream quite a few times, but not recently. I recall crossing this stream require a cautious approach (and a jump?) under ideal conditions. Perhaps the map should not show the footpath crossing the stream? There were two points at which I used to 'get over' this stream. Only one is currently shown. Both are natural. When the stream is in spate, from what I remember, I think one become unusable and the one roughly aligned with the currently unmapped gate becomes more hazardous. |