Regarding way/316126258 and many others - "fixme=check location" Why? For what? Positioning? House number? Something else?

changeset description correction: "add intermittent=yes to a stream* whose path I could see". Saw it just after I hit upload...

Hi,

The course of this road, as you changed it, does not match any satellite imagery source available. No source is specified in your changeset and your changeset comment is just "improvements" (recall that you were previously banned twice for single-word changesets). There are also no GPS traces on OSM that corroborate your change.

Why did you change where this road runs? Did someone really move the road by a few meters?

Por que você mudou onde essa estrada passa? Alguém realmente deslocou a estrada por alguns metros?

I just noticed that I think you might have been using old imagery, as there is a building and parking lot here[1] that I doubt was torn down and converted to farmland recently. Bing and Esri World Imagery seem newer whereas Mapbox seems to have the outdated imagery. Unless you have local knowledge of the place, in that case please let me know!

[1] way/951584426

Could you please check your edits after you upload, see also my other comment on another changeset. This moved a big road incorrectly, it now runs through a bank building. (Probably not visible anymore by the time you see this, as you haven't responded to my comment from 2 days ago and I'll fix this now.)

Hi Kylie! It looks like you unintentionally made the train take a little detour there! Somehow a point on the rail got connected to a nearby street, presumably when you were panning on the map you might have dragged one of the railway's nodes. For reference: https://snipboard.io/gxiZnh.jpg

Since the only other change was to remove the state tag from a house (way/527122762/history), I reverted the two changes. I'm not sure what this #teachosm-project-1263 is; if there is a change you were trying to make then that didn't work. Please let me know if I can help in any way!

Hi! It looks like you accidentally connected the road from a parking lot to something else quite far away. It's about this road: way/731612886

Since the changeset comment is just "area", I have no idea what you were trying to do. Could you have a look at the edit and correct it to be what it should have been? Feel free to ask any questions if I can help somehow!

Dan upload het alleen als je op uploaden drukt. Wijzigingen blijven bewaard bij het verlaten van de app (weet niet zeker of ze ook bewaard blijven bij het killen/force-stoppen van de app, maar ga ik wel vanuit).

Ik snap wel dat het probleem zeldzaam genoeg is dat ze de extra moeite voor deze split-functionaliteit liever besteden aan het verbeteren van andere aspecten zoals quests (en daarmee uiteindelijk de kaartdata). Zou natuurlijk leuk zijn als het beide kon, maar ik snap het wel. Als iemand het erg belangrijk vindt, is het denk ik ofwel zaak om aan te tonen dat het een groter probleem is dan het nu lijkt en de devs te overtuigen, ofwel het zelf te bouwen.

Er zijn twee workarounds mogelijk, ik citeer voor het gemak even uit het Engels:

- Making sure you do a different quest type as last or first change before or after switching area
- Making sure 20 minutes passed since the last upload before uploading changes in a new area

Ik ga er beter op letten :)

Thanks voor je feedback! Had direct na je comment de vraag gesteld aan een van de StreetComplete devs maar nog geen reactie; nu ook een comment toegevoegd in het relevante ticket[1] met de vraag. Moet even kijken hoe dit precies moet, maar linksom of rechtsom moet het wel kunnen :)

[1] https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/2053#issuecomment-739595047

Looks good, thanks for the contribution! :)

Err, thanks iD, just cut off my comment at the moment I hit upload instead of setting a maxlength on the field or warning that it's too long and is going to be cut off... The cut-off bit of changelog message I typed was:

...; merge address nodes with POI (Aldi and Jumbo) and move to the correct place.

Hoi EOSfoto, ik zie dat je een aantal parkeerplaatsen op de kaart gezet hebt (tijdje terug alweer). De gebruikte tag (amenity=parking_space) is echter bedoeld voor individuele parkeervakken, terwijl de gemarkeerde area de hele parkeerplaats omvat. De tag voor een parkeerplaats is amenity=parking. Ik heb een aantal aangepast die ik tegenkwam maar ben er niet grondig langsgegaan. Just FYI :). Thanks voor alle bijdragen aan OSM, je hebt er nogal wat gedaan zie ik! :)

Thanks Leo, ik wist eigenlijk niet eens dat je een verwijderde node kon reviven - nu snap ik waarom de 'wat is de huidige node #1' een quizvraag in SOTM kon zijn! Recent viel me al op dat in de XML er enkel visible=false staat dus nu ik dit zie valt het kwartje ook direct hoe dit werkt. Leuk (weer wat geleerd) :)

Hoi Bart / Hi Bart,
Thanks for updating the map!

Looking at the changeset, you removed one node and added a new one. The old one used to have an address (originating from BAG, the Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen), Nieuwstraat 2, but your new node (Salon Sindy) doesn't have an address. I think you accidentally removed this data from the map. And as an aside, by creating a new node, the history is less visible (see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history ), so it's recommended to just edit the existing node to fit the new situation when the situation has changed.

The old tags can be seen here: node/2790915826/history

Do you want to restore the address and BAG source tags on the Salon Sindy node? (Of course, only if Nieuwstraat 2 still exists there, I assume that didn't change.)

Thanks! :)
Luc

(Reageer in jouw voorkeurstaal, ik wist niet zeker of je (goed) Nederlands kan / Reply in your preferred language, I wasn't sure if you are comfortable with Dutch.)

Right! I hadn't considered that; that makes a lot of sense. I moved the tags from the building into a new node. Thanks for the explanation :)
(For reference: changeset/87779657 / node/7700306417)

Hi aixbrick,
I generally prefer outlines when they're known and the building doesn't seem implausibly large to me. From what I remember from walking by, it seemed to me like they have this building, but you're right, they could probably do with less space and a node would have done fine as well.

As for building=retail, I remembered it was for anything sold to consumers, and indeed the wiki says: "A building primarily used for selling goods to the general public". Not sure if tailored clothes is strictly a "good" but without going into the legal definition, it seemed to fit better than the generic building=yes. Of course, feel free to change it if you think it's inappropriate.

Best,
Luc

Thanks aachso! Long time ago by now but I just used the instructions for the first time (and had this email notification unread in my inbox all this time xD). It's a bit of a weird interface since I'm used to doing relations editing in josm, but your instructions helped and told me where to look, so thanks again :). For the record, new changeset is 86916421 (it contains a couple surveyed changes, but only one new relation so should be trivial to find)

Done in changeset/81985117, thanks for the reminder! Btw, do you happen to know how to add them from iD?

Thanks aixbrick! The existing POI somehow didn't render on OsmAnd, first time that happened, but now I know to search for the POI (because it was in the data even if not rendered) before adding it :)