Interesting, thanks Stephen. I noticed the street sign at the junction for the first time today. Thanks for your insight and contribution, I'll mark the note as resolved.

Hi Stephen, where is your source for this please?

An anonymous mapper mentioned this in an OSM note, I’m curious to know why as I can’t see it indicated anywhere on the street.
note/2893566

Congrats on your first changeset! All the building outlines look fine to me. I've removed the amenity=dentist & healthcare=dentist from the building area as there is a node representing these tags already. Sometimes the building itself has the amenity tags, sometimes mappers create an extra node with them instead. To have both would be duplicating data! Thanks and happy mapping. :)

No issues here - nice to see more details added to buildings!

Hi just to let you know, I’ve removed 2 of the Greggs nodes added in this changeset as it looks like they are already present on the map.
It might be worth updating your map data if it is outdated.

This looks like a bad automated edit - the URL before this change was correct.

All looks fine to me, welcome to osm. :)

Considering this is not it's official name, I'm not sure if it's well suited for inclusion in OSM. Perhaps under the alt_name tag?

I think the newly added Cranbourne Way way is more suited to being highway=residential. Amended in changeset:
changeset/101217015

Can confirm. You're a legend.

Could you fix the tagging here? :)

way/918077128

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can this note now be resolved? Thanks.
note/2199042#map=15/51.4727/-3.2152&layers=N

Oops! Thanks.

Is it likely that the Farm southwest of this changeset is incorrectly named?

oopsies!

Hi Cebderby, there's nothing in the change-set worth re-applying imo. Very useful tool though, thanks for reverting.

This is a bad edit and needs to be reverted. Many of the POIs already existed, and roads have been deformed.

Thanks!

Brownlees is not a trunk road. Please fix!