It looks like this changeset included a larger area than you might have meant. :-) Unless all of these changes were fixing the East Coast Greenway?

Oh I'm so glad you did this. I'd been seeing these out of date buildings on the map every time I'd go to Mahoney's, and kept forgetting to actually go and fix them. Much thanks for resolving my note and getting that done.

Thanks for adding these! In the future, to link notes and changesets, you can put the whole URL, that way it will be clickable. (It'd be nice if changeset #123 was clickable, but that hasn't been implemented yet.)

Ah, there's no need to revert the change on the bench -- assuming it was correct, it's fine. The issue is just that the changes were together in one changeset, and there's nothing to be done about this one; it's just something to watch for in the future. If you change the settings in StreetComplete to upload only when you tell it to, that can help.

Ah, that makes a lot of sense! Check on man_made=embankment for an existing tag that might work. And if it doesn't, feel free to make up a new tag that isn't used yet and just apply it yourself.

Looks like this was fixed by another editor in changeset/160942436

As you might have noticed, it looks like StreetComplete accidentally included changes on both sides of the Atlantic in this changeset. I'm sure you already know to avoid this, but just in case: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

As you might have noticed, it looks like StreetComplete accidentally included changes on both sides of the Atlantic in this changeset. I'm sure you already know to avoid this, but just in case: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

I think this changeset broke the coastline, due to the unconnected ways tagged with natural=coastline. I'm confused about what you were intending here?

Oh that's a *WONDERFULLY* useful resource -- I'll add it to the (newly created) wiki page: osm.wiki/Woburn,_Massachusetts . And it makes sense about the sign getting hit and not replaced yet.

All good -- sometimes things get moved by accident. Thanks for all your work surveying and adding details around Woburn!

Oy. That's a lovely 'feature'. Good to know!

No worries -- thanks for adding the townships at all ; it prompted me to look into them, which was fun.

And it should be fixed now (I hope!)

That makes a lot of sense! If/when you get a chance, updating the wiki with the above notes would be great. For now, I've linked this changeset on the talk page.

I'm working on fixing this, and discussing it here. I have to take a quick break for dinner, but will try and do the rest of the fixes tonight. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-of-iowa-townships/121070/11

Ah, it was adding this node: node/12467967215 (thanks https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz for being one of the few changeset viewers that can handle large bboxes!)

Whoops, along with the good changes in Stratford, it looks like this changeset accidentally included at least one change over in Easton, PA, USA! It's best to try and avoid this, as it confuses monitoring tools. You can see more about this on osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Heh, with just two changes so far apart, it would have been nice to put them in separate changesets to avoid a cross-Atlantic bounding box. In any case, thanks for fixing the typo.

Please try to avoid large changeset bounding boxes like this. It helps others in tracking changes. You can see more details about this in the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on
osm.wiki/Changeset