The archipelago is the Lucayan Archipelago currently mapped as a separate relation as it includes Turks and Caicos.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113594883

@grin I have, especially the bit that says:
> This includes:
> - use of find-and-replace functionality using a standard editor such as JOSM or finding using services such as Overpass API and changing without reviewing cases individually;
> - manually changing tags without adequate review;

482 objects across several continents seems a long time to forget the upload button if you're actually checking each object.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This changeset edited climbing areas in North America as well. When editing multiple disconnected areas please try to split the edits up into logical chunks. Big changesets notify a lot of people who like to keep an eye on their local areas.

Where was this mechanical edit discussed? osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113316313

Hello. If these areas are like the similar looking mangroves on the north shore of Grand Bahama they are probably waterway=tidal_channel rather than waterway=stream or waterway=river.

source should read Bing; Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta); Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta

Source should read source Bing; Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta); Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta

This does not appear to be a part of the track in person.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111527668

Why have you made this non-routable?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111538558

Welcome to OpensStreetMap. This changeset appears to include edits on both sides of the Atlantic, if possible please try to save between edits in widely separated areas to keep the bounding box down.

Construction should be prefixed or tagged with dedicated construction tagging. In this case proposed would be more appropriate as construction hasn't started. However overriding both of those is the copyright notice on the bottom of that page indicating that it doesn't meet the licensing requirements for inclusion in OSM.

osm.wiki/Construction
proposed=*
osm.wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data

This doesn't appear on the cited imagery. Do you have another source?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110009487

This marina is already mapped as way/963496865 . There should really only be one copy of it in the database.

Has Pier 1 really relocated to be nowhere near the harbour?

Thanks.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap,
The bounding box for this changeset is very large, please save your edits before working in a different area.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
This edit seems to have added a node tagged with just a height near Milwaukee. Did you mean to add this node?

Have you verified that this is not misspelled on the sign?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106341318

I think you may have misplaced the end of a pier here.

The old_name:en is rather dubious. No "North" mentioned: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105110241