OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
87994198

Actually additions from serial imagery.

87994080

Actually additions from serial imagery.

87717544

I think your bounding box might be a little larger than you expected here.

87413893

This edit directly contradicts streetlevel imagery and is completely inconsistent with OSM conventions on mapping single carriageways.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=25.046498821556398&lng=-77.32342813041345&z=16.021792370706056&pKey=ZTFCW_V3xnbQdYrZS4zgSg&focus=photo

87105146

What is this supposed to represent? This does not look like a mountain.

86925123

Do you have a source for this claim?

86924996

Where did you find this name?

86597997

Thanks
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86597997

86482550

You seem to have deleted a couple of addresses when tracing buildings.

Please don't delete useful information unless you have copied it to new geometry.

86072524

Where is the discussion for this mechanical edit?

62986624

"Sammy's Bar & Grill" appears to be in a swamp. Are you sure this location is correct?

85731724

Oops.

Thanks.

83779658

I am curious. What does "us" stands for in this context?

82879801

The recently approved waterway=tidal_channel might be appropriate for some of these.

82603198

Are you sure that OSM was incorrect for ALL of these? It is reasonably common for signage or documents to simplify spelling and this simplification should be preserved in OSM if official.

82273484

Maxar Imagery seems an unlikely source for a road name?

82184029

Where did you learn of this usage? The last local mapper explicitly changed this *from* service to track and the aerial imagery shows something that looks very informal.

82183054

This appear in neither of the publicly available Maxar sources, do you have a valid source for this geometry?

82184029

Note that the previous classification of this road was done by a local mapper who is likely to have visited the road in question.
Do you have streetlevel imagery not cited in your changeset?

82019388

I do not think the staff (west) and public (east) car parks were that interconnected when I last used (one of) them. Note also that no publicly available satellite imagery that I have seen reflects the state post Dorian.