InsertUser's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 164723762 | Please save in between changes in different areas. Big bounding boxes make things more difficult for people trying to keep an eye on their local area. |
|
| 164315013 | Please do not add fictional nonsense to the map. |
|
| 164272291 | Yes, should be reasonably easy to do in JOSM. As it looks like this was an import in the changeset comment: has it been checked for license compatibility? |
|
| 164272291 | Are the `addr:postalcode` tags on this changeset meant to be `addr:postcode`? |
|
| 164056370 | Source? |
|
| 163876028 | I think you can leave off the postcode if there is none rather than making up a postcode of 0000. |
|
| 163496012 | What is your actual source for this? |
|
| 163283798 | This seems to suggest that there is a basement in a building suspiciously close to sea level. Is this maybe a typo or something that could be better suited to a level:ref tag? |
|
| 162894069 | What is the basis for overriding local knowledge here? |
|
| 162790023 | Please save in between editing in different regions. |
|
| 162705151 | Why? |
|
| 162361638 | @silversurfer83 are you reverting? |
|
| 162242929 | What justification do you have for tagging node/12491868091 as an Australian bank from half a world away rather than the local Commonwealth Bank?
|
|
| 162188392 | Where was the discussion for this mechanical edit? It seems to be to match a rejected proposal.
|
|
| 161831541 | I have updated this to include the amenity=police tag to indicate that this is an active police station based on the name. Please delete the tag if it is actually abandoned. |
|
| 160397945 | Please save before moving on to another area as this makes it easier for others to check. |
|
| 161263124 | Do you have a source for this? The "scrub" areas look more like grass on the imagery. |
|
| 149035574 | There are lots of maps using OpenStreetMap data. Rendering differs from map to map. |
|
| 160677303 | Please save in between edits in widely spaced areas. Some people keep an eye on their local areas based on the bounding boxes of edits. |
|
| 160035707 | The inevitable collateral of this sort of blind find and delete edit is one of the main reasons for the longstanding policy against this sort of slapdash mechanical edits. Here you took genuine edits by people trying to improve things and instead of manually reviewing them to see what the correct tagging might be you have just done a find and delete on edits using words you don't like. There are reasons for the policy against this. |