Hufkratzer's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 120694828 | Just for information: I have already asked the iD maintainers to list the preset for riding arenas higher up when you seach for "horse" (see https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/413), but I don't know how long it will take for someone to improve that. |
|
| 120694828 | I didn't mean to discourage you from mapping riding arenas. But I would recommend to use the preset for riding arenas (in iD editor search for "riding arena"). Then you will automatically get the right tags. |
|
| 120694828 | Yes, that's obvious, and such small arenas were horses are ridden/exercised are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (compare leisure=pitch#Riding_arena) and not with leisure=horse_riding. Like you also don't tag a single tennis court with leisure=sports_centre. Here is an example of an area tagged with leisure=horse_riding which contains a ridng arena tagged with leisure=pitch + süort=equestrian: way/999971685. |
|
| 120694828 | Hi, I want to ask why you have tagged way/1058272873 with leisure=horse_riding. You have tagged more than 200 similar areas like that. This tag is for places like riding centres or riding stables. I don't know these places, but in the aerial view most of the areas that you have tagged with leisure=horse_riding look more like simple riding arenas (which may or may not be part of a riding centre / riding stables); they also have no name. Riding arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. You have tagged a few this way some years ago but since then used leisure=horse_riding. Why? I am asking this because the maintainers of the OSM Carto map have refused to render leisure=horse_riding a while ago mainly because it looked like too many riding arenas were tagged with leisure=horse_riding. |
|
| 32411134 | Why did you change the route type from horse to foot here? I think this is the riding route from Kostrzyn to Nowe Polichno for which I started a new relation (6247548) recently before I saw this one. Since your relation is older I propose that I move the elements from the new one to this one and change the tags like they are in the new one (back to horse route). Do you mind if I do that or do you have objections? |