Please be aware that it the correct syntax is `LV:urban` with capitalized "LV" not `lv:urban`.

Does the living zone here way/124046924 end at a different location now? The latest street imagery suggest it was mapped correctly before. What has changed here?

Hello,

If a street is in a 30 zone, then it should not be a living street (which is only for living zones). For example, way/402489748 . If the road in incorrectly mapped as living street, then you should change it to a residential road or service road or whatever is appropriate. Or at least leave a note here that it needs to be fixed.

You are confusing an address point with a physical feature. There is no requirement for there to be "something" for an address to exist. The data is correct.

18. aprīlī aizlieguma zīmes vairs neredzēju. Tā gan sestdiena, nezinu, vai varēja būt noņemtas uz nogali.

Hello,

Please do not change seasonal speed limits for the main maxspeed value. These were already correctly mapped in maxspeed:conditional tags for approximate time periods.

I don't disagree that this is a stupid place for these signs. And the actual intent here is that cars shouldn't enter these footways. But regardless they are still traffic signs and legally binding and that's what OSM follows for tagging. Technically, anyone can get traffic signs installed if they can get municipality/council approval. I have no idea if these have been approved - one would have to contact municipality building authority department.

Hello, please don't delete/remove addresses. These are valid nodes by themselves that represent official data. These are automatically imported and mostly correct.

Ielas vēl nav izbūvētas - aktīvi darbi. Pašlaik grantenes. Dzīvojamā zona vēl nav uzlikta. Iebraukt teorētiski var; es gan neiebraucu, jo tur būvtehnika tieši braukāja.

What happened is you removed the building tag, which means this is no longer tagged as a building, but only parking. And additionally parking=surface means it's parking with a view of the sky, basically an open parking lot. Those were presumably not intended, so I can fix those, but I'm not sure I understand where the parking actually is (and was before). Is it underground? Looking at street imagery, I don't really see any signs or underground parking entrances. Do you perhaps have a photo or something to show the situation?

Hello,

Could you clarify what exactly has changed here? Is the building demolished and parking built in its place?

You have not replied to any of your changeset comments or fixed any of the issues, but the routing remains broken, so I have reverted your edits. I have previously already asked you to slow down and make sure your edits are correct before uploading. Now these mass edits added so many issues that no other volunteer editor is expected to fix these after you. And you cannot leave such broken data for many days while the changes propagate to navigation apps and other maps.

Please only restore your edits or make new ones if you are going to fix all the errors without any guessing about what is a ford or a bridge or a culvert.

Do not use AI tools / RapID unless you are going to manually check the additions. It always has errors and always needs to be reviewed. It also uses Bing, which is misaligned and possibly out of date.

Do not click the "fix" button in the iD editor unless you understand what it does and are fully intending the change. Not all warnings are errors that can be fixed as offered, nor can you fix many of them without actually surveying on location.

And please use the latest aerial instead of relying on Bing or old data, especially if you see there are newer edits in the area (such as around the airport).

Ideally, split your large edits by what you are doing and don't mix different changes - it is impossible to fix without fully reverting the whole changeset.

Almost all your changeset comments are just "edit, add places", which means nothing and does not explain to other editors what you are doing or what sources exactly you are using. In the future, please start providing an actual description of your mass edits, because there clearly are issues that need to be checked by others.

If you don't know how to fix these issues, then contact the OSM community first for guidance before making so many changes.

This reverts:
181318104 - large number of invalid fords
181319563 - multiple invalid fords
181326370 - couple invalid fords
181328946 - huge number of invalid fords
181329124 - badly-fixed fords
181385638 - multiple invalid fords
181385842 - multiple invalid fords
181431035 - multiple invalid fords
181431135 - couple invalid fords, overlapping/duplicate waterways
181431481 - multiple invalid fords
181472762 - large number of invalid fords, bad waterway layer
181479807 - large number of invalid fords, bad waterway layer
181480373 - multiple invalid fords
181480457 - badly-fixed fords, new issues introduced
181497170 - multiple invalid fords
181497376 - overlapping/duplicate waterway

Yes, a survey would be needed for the exact signage. It's very hard to say otherwise and I am not familiar with the area. We can adjust the values then - I am not yet sure what they should be at the moment.

How do cars access this location - from way/1063716658 direction ? You only tagged one section, so I am unsure which route they have to take.

Please fix your edits. There are many roads that are now blocked by fords/ditches and navigation is broken. You cannot leave such issues for multiple days.

This edit especially has added a huge number of incorrect waterways and invalid fords blocking routing all over the place. Even where you attempted to fix some of it, you left fords all across the parking ways like node/13730335051. Please fix all of these.

This line way/1500109234 has no tags.

Please stop mass-editing waterways like this. You are creating invalid fords, invalid bridges, bad geometry and routing, invalid layers, etc. Please fix all these issues promptly because you are breaking navigation. And fix all your previous recent edits before you make any new ones.

Please fix all the incorrect fords you created.

Why is this ditch layer=1 way/1423368955 ?

Please fix all the incorrect fords you created.

Why is this ditch layer=1 way/155730973 ?