Greg_Rose's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178464906 | Thanks for the reply! I had assumed that the location was meant to be within Mauritania, since it had tags referring to the Adel Bagrou department and commune within Mauritania. I will move the node back over to the previous location, since I have an open changeset in the area that I am working on. |
|
| 178464906 | Hi Jorieke... I've moved the place node for Emberat Ehl Echek Sid Ahmed from 15.4761,-7.097 (in Mali) to 15.5092,-7.0553 within Mauritania. How precise of a geolocation did you have for that village? I moved it to the nearest sizable village within Mauritania, just south of Adel Bagrou - hopefully that works within your data framework. Thx! |
|
| 152408875 | I fixed, fyi |
|
| 152408875 | Undoubtedly that's what I *intended* to do. I was changing from building=yes;name=PHARMACIE and didn't think about what I was doing. Pls edit correctly if you are so inclined. |
|
| 178605297 | Well it turns out that not only is the usage I knew for place=suburb deprecated, the OSM definition of suburb is completely different from North American english. I changed back almost all of the places I turned into neighborhoods. Sorry about that.
|
|
| 178605297 | @Sammyhawkrad Reverted a bunch of ped streets to footways in downtown Accra fyi. |
|
| 178605297 | Thx for the reply @Sammyhawkrad - I'll answer these tomorrow. Today was a chemotherapy infusion day for me and I'm crashing now (it's midnight here) |
|
| 178605297 | @Enock4seth Please specify which places changed to neighborhoods from suburbs are incorrect. The very definition of the suburb tag shows that it was created for rendering. Plopping a new suburb down every 300 meters goes against everything in the definition. While it could be argued that some of these are quarters instead of neighborhoods, that's mostly just semantics. |
|
| 178605297 | Sorry @Enock4seth didn't notice you had inserted yourself in the convo - thought I was still talking to sammyhawkrad |
|
| 178605297 | There is a difference between "mapping for the renderer" and "mapping so it renders". I don't map for a specific downstream client, so I'm not "mapping for the renderer" - I'm just trying to make sure that these areas and districts actually show up! It sounds like you're local and you couldn't care less about them rendering so I'll stop changing them. |
|
| 178605297 | Building=part has to be in a relation for it to be valid. The only parts I deleted were for buildings that were already mapped as building=yes. Some of the stand-alone parts I just retagged as building=yes. |
|
| 178605297 | suburbs vs neighborhoods - pls look at the definition for each.
|
|
| 178605297 | Deleted church: Pls identify via node id |
|
| 178605297 | You're kinda spamming me with questions so pls be patient as I answer.
|
|
| 50215691 | Uhhhhhhh....
|
|
| 168122797 | Got it - thx! |
|
| 168122797 | Give me the way id# |
|
| 166906308 | main source = Grand Co cadastral database : roads and parcel layers |
|
| 162191423 | It was supposed to be "alt_name". It has been fixed - thx for letting me know. |
|
| 163196582 | Aluu and hello! - Thanks for your contributions, but this is most definitely not how you mark out a trail on OSM. Duplicating a trail over a road tells the map database that there are 2 separate ways there.
|