Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for trying. Kindly zoom in to see existing features before adding new one to avoid duplicates. LearnOSM - https://learnosm.org/en/ is a good starting resource

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please don't just copy-paste random text from the company website into the description field without reading. See Version 1 and 2 node/9061794300/history

Then name on the area - way/169474247 conflicts with the place node - node/7829122627

Can you please help clarify this?

Not sure this node/4595319470 has moved here, can you please clarify?

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, LearnOSM - https://learnosm.org/en/ is a good starting resource.

Adding ways without any tagging is like adding nothing.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, LearnOSM - https://learnosm.org/en/ is a good starting resource.

Adding ways without any tagging is like adding nothing.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, LearnOSM - https://learnosm.org/en/ is a good starting resource.

Adding ways without any tagging is like adding nothing.

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. This way/414615656 is not a farmland :), I have changed to school which seems to be the nearest from my observation and fixme on way/981903320/history

LearnOSM is a good resource for getting started https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/

Glad to hear you don't map these anymore. Thank you for your comment, this has been fixed now.

You might also want to re-visit similar previous contributions and fix them yourself too.

Hello, I find this and other changesets around have used nodes to map buildings. Could you please convert them to areas where applicable? Good Bing imagery exist.

In the first place, why are you mapping so called 'small residential roads' that do not even exist? It is not just about me or other mappers making whatever changes / correcting it, but you being aware and stopping these kinds of mapping.

Glad you can tell, it's a mess.

WHAT! This doesn't look good. What is this you have done around here: way/208562207 mapping roads? Can you clarify what you are trying to achieve?

Could you please clarify the name for this way/961009041

Also, it's overlapping with existing building. Please kindly zoom in to see all existing features before adding new ones to avoid duplicates.

@Mark Kindly represent only one feature with one element, instead of tagging both building and node as same feature. See osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Please also avoid using links to commercial / copyrighted images. See image=*

The ``building" and ``name" values looks confusing here way/937555731 , is this a garage for the school or this is the school itself. Can you kindly clarify or help fix? Thanks

Sorry, wrong changeset for this comment

The ``building" and ``name" values looks confusing here way/937555731 , is this a garage for the school or this is the school itself. Can you kindly clarify or help fix? Thanks

Kindly represent only one feature with one element, instead of tagging all buildings and the entire area as a clinic. See osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I am sure the name of this way/972858092 not "Rice" can you please update or explain what you are trying to say?

I have a strong feeling Maxar Standard Imagery hasn't the best alignment with existing data but was used to add new/update data, ignoring alignment with other imagery such as Bing. Can you please clarify what happened here?