DUGA's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 125166163 | Put the source in your changeset comments. |
|
| 148987332 | Wellsites cannot be mapped like that. |
|
| 49456871 | Spam removed |
|
| 149587340 | Is this creek intermittent? |
|
| 116051463 | Your TIGER updates in this area is mostly questionable. TIGER cleanup is not just for the tags, geometries need to be updated and fixed. Removing all tags leaves everyone else harder to track the actual junk from 2007. |
|
| 146375571 | Please put source in the changeset but not here. |
|
| 136092725 | Please stop using AI to vandalize the map, you will be reported for nosense like this one: |
|
| 131045574 | Unfortunately it is not paved. If you do not live around, do not tag surface just based on the online photos. |
|
| 126230980 | Can you take a look and let me know which one should be kept, grass or wood? |
|
| 147434448 | Most of the driveways do not need a fancy name. |
|
| 149369008 | openstreetmap.org/way/10697021/history |
|
| 149369008 | When TIGER was imported years ago, the alignment was terrible. If you remove TIGER flags, at least you need to align them with a valid orthoimagery. Other editors will track changes based on tags, if you drop these tags while leaving the ugly alignments there, essentially everyone else will have a tough time locating TIGER junks. |
|
| 144376780 | It should be unsigned_ref, perhaps iD didn’t fill in correctly. I will get it fixed by the EOD. |
|
| 149552099 | Unfortunately, there is no threatening, you can be reported by anyone at any time even without a reason. OSM DWG will determine the issue. Based on your editing history, I will “have to” watch your edits closely. Disconnecting a river is 100% considered vandalism regardless of your intent. Attaching/drawing boundaries not 100% the same as any “official” source is actually not, just take a look at China vs India around Tibet. Back to the states, many digital boundaries you see online might not be updated, you need to be careful when importing/following them. You will not become a friend of anyone over the Internet, code of conduct is the lowest standard, and I didn’t violate it. |
|
| 149552099 | Many boundaries are based on rivers (could be centerline or bank). iD has a layer of PA boundary and we can use it, it is mostly the same as Census. |
|
| 149552099 | What you did here is completely wrong, you literally cut the river and disconnect them. PA legislature has not updated the boundary for decades, many of them used to follow rivers or street but due to terrain changes they are not accurate anymore. I don't want to argue with you over how PA legislature works, but you are required to fix the broken river way or I have to report this changeset. |
|
| 139590469 | PennDOT never numbered any town road, using ref:penndot is literally wrong. |
|
| 138965948 | I believe none of these naturally exist, they are all artificial lakes which is why I tag all of them as basin. |
|
| 109222070 | No exit is only supposed to use at the final node of a segment. Routing does not need this tag to figure out if it is a dead end or not. |
|
| 109178140 | I think that I didn’t revert, but redraw few objects |