DFW-Backyard7's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 182347873 | Hi! The tags for these are landuse=industrial and industrial=wellsite . I've fixed the tag on this one for you, thanks for finding it :) |
|
| 182302202 | What did you mean by Entry=no/yes? If you're referring to whether the general public is permitted/able to go through the gate, the normal tag for it is access=private or access=yes (or access=no if it's usable by literally nobody including emergency responders) |
|
| 182231170 | Hello, The tag highway=services indicates highway/motorway service stations, not features that would be present in an amusement park. Please consult the wiki for tags when you aren't sure about their intended usage. It's not immediately clear to me what you were intended to map with these. Could you please clarify? Furthermore, you have not been listing sources with any of your changesets. In OSM we must be able to know how users obtained the information they map (whether it be observing it personally, viewed from aerial imagery, from a particular dataset, etc). Could you please fill the Sources field in each changeset with the source of the information? source=*#How_to_use_on_changesets |
|
| 182057968 | Do these pathways you removed, particularly the ones around the amphitheater, still exist? They still show on all the newest aerial imagery for me. If they were recently demolished, it would be better to use `demolished:highway` on a temporary basis until some aerials are updated, so that other editors don't get confused, and to put `landuse=construction` around the area of construction. If they do still exist on the ground but are just not accessible, they should be left but tagged with `access=private` or `access=no`. I'm just a little confused by how many still-visible-on-aerial roads and paths are now gone from the map. By the way, do you know the current status of the Six Flags Railway? I see that goes through an area that looks to be under construction. |
|
| 182005313 | Hello! Please see this site for the list of standard tags that ALPRs need to have to be recognized by apps like deflock https://deflock.org/report/id I'll fix this one, but specifically it should have at least man_made=surveillance
And if known for sure that it's flock (and not say, motorola) |
|
| 181960165 | I have reverted this as there is no parking lot here. There once was, but it has been demolished, as evidenced by the newer esri imagery and the landuse=construction describing the construction project. |
|
| 181771617 | Just checked for myself and there really are ALPRs there. What a strange decision by Frisco lol. There were some ptz cameras along the trail too which I added the rest of I think |