DENelson83's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 115196320 | Fixed in changeset #115255053. |
|
| 114912294 | Fixed. Thank you. |
|
| 114876737 | I will look into that. Thanks. |
|
| 114311127 | Those are indeed automated imports from CanVec. I have also been converting some of them to tidalflats as I come across them, using guidance from Canadian Hydrographic Service charts. The tag "ocean=yes" has a purpose. It stems from a discussion on the talk-ca mailing list about issues with the maintainability of the area definition data I have been putting in for named bodies of seawater. Anyone can filter out data with that tag if they want to work on the coastline without worrying about breaking anything, even those relations I have been adding, as I have stated on talk-ca that I am willing to maintain the area definition data for seawater in Canada. |
|
| 113353566 | You duplicated Mermaid Cove. |
|
| 114579365 | I am regularly visiting OSM Inspector and following up on anything it reports needs my attention. |
|
| 114545684 | In case you are wondering why it looks like part of the St. Lawrence Estuary has "dried up", it is because the coastline has been extended in this area, and it will take a bit of time for the coastline rendering routine in the OSM-Carto tiles to catch up to this. |
|
| 114311127 | Good job on helping to continue maintaining this coastline data. I have been in this area adding relations for named bodies of seawater, and we recently had a discussion on the talk-ca mailing list raising concerns that the data I was adding might not easily be maintainable in the face of other editors continuing to maintain the actual coastline data. I added a special tag to the bodies of seawater relations, "ocean"="yes", to allow other editors to filter out the data set I was adding so they can continue to maintain the coastline while I continue to maintain the named bodies of seawater. This is a perfect example of collaboration among multiple editors to improve many distinct facets of OpenStreetMap's database. Thank you so much, and keep it up. |
|
| 112925087 | In case you are wondering why it looks like this area of water has "dried up", it is because the coastline has been extended in this area, and it will take a bit of time for the coastline rendering routine in the OSM-Carto tiles to catch up to this. |
|
| 112567256 | I have been using Ctrl+Alt+D in JOSM in a bid to catch any relations I might have affected and make sure they remained intact. Obviously several relations fell through the cracks, and I intend to fix those with the aid of the OSM Inspector. |
|
| 111789884 | The postal code for this post office has changed to G6P 0A0. Le code postal pour ce bureau de poste a changé à G6P 0A0. |
|
| 110642681 | Because that is how the whole BC coast is structured in OSM. |
|
| 110642681 | Names of bodies of water should not overlap. "Burrard Inlet" should not overlap with English Bay, Vancouver Harbour, Indian Arm or Port Moody. |
|
| 110480409 | How can we tell if these are federal vs. provincial/territorial electoral districts? Can you put an additional tag in to distinguish the two? |
|
| 109953592 | The community in question is here. relation/11518212 |
|
| 109953592 | It's actually the community that has been renamed, not the stream itself. |
|
| 109600346 | Take a look at the inner ring of that relation on Effingham Island. |
|
| 109600346 | Looks like you broke the relation for Pacific Rim National Park Reserve Broken Group Islands Unit. |
|
| 98950946 | Understood. |
|
| 98950946 | It's the name that I chose, because it's the name that I felt suited the highway best. If you feel that is too subjective, then I will let you change it to what you feel is best, and I will not touch it again. |