OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

CycleStreets's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by CycleStreets

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
2915133 CycleStreets

Is there now a cycle plug here?

4702717 CycleStreets

Sustrans mapping defines this section as NCN51, joining the existing NCN51 under at the bridge to NCN11 at the Riverside Bridge.

https://data-sustrans-uk.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/6336de1429c5459a92563464a6820486_0/explore?location=52.214184%2C0.145254%2C16.11

4210393 CycleStreets

We understand this track is now a dedicated cycle track, but it is currently shown as shared use.

If pedestrians are not using the cycle track but are expected to go on a separate pavement, this should be tagged as cycleway=track, foot=no, and there should be either a separate footway added, or sidewalk=left.

4733229 CycleStreets

the roads in this area still 30 mph? Rest of Edinburgh is almost all 20 mph.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23cH

4757567 CycleStreets

Path has been widened - new width needs surveying.

4003413 CycleStreets

Is cycling permitted on this path?

4003505 CycleStreets

We believe there is cycle parking at the station but cannot see where exactly it is.

3851552 CycleStreets

There is a pelican crossing noted here, not visible on the aerial imagery, right next to a signalised crossing. Is this correct?

2814573 CycleStreets

There are two gates here into what looks like it could be a gated community. Should those gates be marked access=private?

4770184 CycleStreets

There is a separately draw-in cycleway. Therefore the road itself should not have osm.wiki/Tag:cycleway=... present.