OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

CycleStreets's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by CycleStreets

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
2797746 CycleStreets

Is this passable? We've been told:

"Wall between public footway and private land."

2540207 CycleStreets

Possible missing parking and route here? Needs ground survey.

3492314 CycleStreets

Could someone verify this underpass route is closed? We have received feedback:

'The pedestrian / cycle path marked coleshill interchange, starting at ryeclose croft, which used to go under the M6, is closed. Looks like since a long time. It connects Chelmsley Wood and Coleshill.'

3487153 CycleStreets

We have been told that this area is 'muddy'. Could osm.wiki/Tag:surface=... be added to the ways in this green area?

3487152 CycleStreets

This way is marked as part of a cycle route, but is set as foot=yes without bicycle=yes. Are bicycles permitted?

3195175 CycleStreets

Is it really the case that people are forbidden to walk or cycle here? Pretty sure that wasn't the case when we last visited.

Currently there is bicycle=no and foot=no.

3128747 CycleStreets

There is a traffic_signals on the crossing as well as the traffic light itself - which means a double delay, which is presumably incorrect.

3469458 CycleStreets

Question from one of our users:

I would like to know if the shared path on Rush Green Road for pedestrians and cyclists that is on the same side of the road as the YMCA building is for one way cycling only, i.e. going towards Becontree, or can it be used for cycling in both directions, i.e. going towards Roneo Corner as well?

2593877 CycleStreets

Can this be cycled through also?

2420422 CycleStreets

We've been told either this or the other entrance to the cemetery is a "permanently closed gate".

However, assuming this refers to this gate, it is marked as permissive, implying that it is normally open (but that such permission could be withdrawn by the landowner).

Could someone check whether any gate is permanently closed, and if so, presumably avoid using access=permissive?