No worries. My small edits don't usually have a lot in the notes/comments section, but ones with this magnitude usually contain more details.

Having comments is usually enough to kind of scan through it.

No worries! Welcome to OSM and see you around!

Can you elaborate more on what you do in your changesets or why? Putting "a" does not help us in understanding what was done or why. Thanks.

Changeset notes/comments are extremely useful in trying to discern why features were deleted.

Can you elaborate more on what you do in your changesets or why? Putting "a" does not help us in understanding what was done or why. Thanks.

Can you elaborate more on what you do in your changesets or why? Putting "a" does not help us in understanding what was done or why. Thanks.

Can you elaborate more on what you do in your changesets or why? Putting "a" does not help us in understanding what was done or why. Thanks.

Can you elaborate more on what you do in your changesets or why? Putting "a" does not help us in understanding what was done or why. Thanks.

Can you explain what you did? Putting ":)" in the changeset comments doesn't provide much insight into what was done or why.

Thanks!

Not sure why cartpaths were removed. Theya re still present on satellite imagery and the golf course still exists. This change has been reverted since there is no reason on why the feature(s) were deleted.

Not sure why cartpaths were removed. Theya re still present on satellite imagery and the golf course still exists. This change has been reverted since there is no reason on why the feature(s) were deleted.

Not sure why holes were removed. They are still present on satellite imagery and the golf course still exists. This change has been reverted since there is no reason on why the feature(s) were deleted.

Not sure why cartpaths were removed. Theya re still present on satellite imagery and the golf course still exists. This change has been reverted since there is no reason on why the feature(s) were deleted.

Why did you remove the holes?

Can you explain what you did in the changeset comments? Putting "." does not provide info on what was done or why.

Ah, I checked one of them and it wasn't there. Thanks for checking and correcting this!

Hello,

Google is not an acceptable source for edits on OpenStreetMaps. It is a proprietary source. It is copyrighted and is explicitly not allowed.

Source:
osm.wiki/Google

Potential data sources include:
osm.wiki/Potential_Datasources

Hello,

Google is not an acceptable source for edits on OpenStreetMaps. It is a proprietary source. It is copyrighted and is explicitly not allowed.

Source:
osm.wiki/Google

Potential data sources include:
osm.wiki/Potential_Datasources

Reverting changeset as this is a fantasy course/mapping and does not exist in the actual world.

Please only map what is on the ground.

This is appears to be an imaginary / fantasy disc golf course that doesn't actually exist.

this was confirmed indirectly by:
note/2979166

I contend that this changeset should be reverted.

Why did you delete the driveway and building?

No worries! It happens. It's an OSM guideline or rule of thumb. When edits for two POIs stretch entire continents, it can make it hard to sift through changesets in a particular region. Say, for example, Kansas, someone wants to see potential changes to the farmlands, this changeset would also pop up.

Anyhow, welcome to OSM! Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. I'll see you around, especially once you join the OSM Discord. Haha