You should not have changed this tag....

tourism=camp_pitch

Changeset reverted in part or full.

All the campsites were mapped as individual campgrounds/RV Parks. They should be mapped as campsites, as a part of the campground, so 1 campground (or RV Park) total.

Welcome to OSM. Changeset looks good. Keep up the good work!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152606557

Welcome to OSM! Your edit looks good - keep up the great work!

Another app to check out is StreetComplete. :)

Welcome to OSM. Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152614091

What's up with not adding a bridge section where the cartpath goes over the water?

You haven't responded to previous changeset comments, and are continuing to make the same errors. Specifically, you are continuing to "lollipop" or fold an area back on itself, but leave a little sliver to try and make a hole when you should use multipolygon relations.

It appears you received previous blocks for this, and yet, here we are.

Welcome to OSM!

Do not partially overlap areas. Please review the below webpage before making further edits.

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=for%20golf%20vehicule.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152473044

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.%20Use%20multipolygons%20instead.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152560254

Please review:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.%20Use%20multipolygons%20instead.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152560776

Do not "lollipop" features to try and create a hole for your golf game.

C/S fixed.

Edit looks good. The road appears to be a relic from an original TIGER import. Thanks for removing.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152499896

Reverted in part or full. Deleting "private" features is not the answer. Access tags should be used instead, but they were already added. You can read why deletion is not the solution:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property#:~:text=In%20OSM%2C%20we%20map%20what's,path%20and%20add%20it%20again.

changeset/152513518

C/S looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152462608

Reverted in part or full. This is visible on aerial imagery. You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/152360902

Reverted in part or full. This is visible on aerial imagery. You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/152360902

Reverted in part or full. This is visible on aerial imagery. You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/152360902

Please do not delete driveways that are visible in aerial imagery. Readding them.

Ok. Cool. Just wanted to make sure it was all only one-way and not like 1 lane each way. :)

Happy mapping.

Is the bridge one-way only northbound?