This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Item is movable and after further discussion, I am wrong. Portable features should not be mapped since they can move, however, just because it is "private" doesn't really mean it shouldn't be mapped.

changeset/149839258

I do request that better changeset comments be used to explain why they are being deleted, and not just "private."

I was thinking of it as no different from a pool, which we would map.

But thinking about the portability side, I do concur it shouldn't be mapped. I disagree on the "private" argument, but the portability, I 100% agree.

I am going to revert my revert.

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

changeset/149822738

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. If something is "private", then access tags should be used. They should not just be deleted.

changeset/149822738

Good building outlines.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149797445

Do not partially overlap areas. I have cleaned it up for you here.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149795172

What's up with purposely not adding golfcarts as bridges where there is one? You're just randomly leaving gaps?

Do not partially overlap areas.

I also explained it here in response to a note on my changeset.

changeset/149548637

Do not partially overlap areas.

Do not delete and re-add features. This destroys revision history.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149783113

Do not partially overlap areas.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149711793

Access tags should be used instead of deletion.

access=*

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/149758554

Again,

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.%20Use%20multipolygons%20instead.

And again:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.%20Use%20multipolygons%20instead.