Did you forget to change the business type of "Dominos", or is it really a laundromat sharing a name with the pizza chain?

Is level 8 really the correct level here? Neighborhoods (if they're administrative entities) are usually level 10. If they're not administrative, they're "place=neighborhood" rather than "boundary=administrative".

Where did you get the name "Gravel Point Cemetery" from? USGS topo maps call it "Wayside Cemetery", the GNIS node you deleted called it "Wayside Cemetary", and county records say it's run by the "Wayside Cemetery Association".

Are all the paths in the University of Montana really cycleways, and not sidewalks that permit bicycles?

When you're expanding things from nodes to areas like you did with the Blue Mountain Clinic, please remember to copy over information like the address and opening hours.

If you're not going to use meaningful changeset comments, could you at least use longer ones? A single comma is a bit tricky to click on in the history view.

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

Reverted in changeset/87582017

National forests are not "landuse=forest" under *any* of the many competing definitions of that tag. I've reverted this changeset.

Could you change how you go about expanding business nodes into building outlines? The way you're doing it right now, it loses information such as the address of the Shady Sprurce Hostel, or the fact that the Sinclair station sells diesel.

Is there a reason why you tagged a whole bunch of houses as offices, when they clearly aren't?

It looks like you used 'building:part=yes' on everything here. Was that an accident, or are you halfway through more-detailed mapping of them?

Please don't re-tag ordinary sidewalks as bicycle paths.