Did you mean to mark a section of railroad as "abandoned" in this edit? The section near the Baird Springs Road tunnel doesn't look abandoned to me, just shadowed by the edge of the cutting.

The "name" field should only be used to give the names of things, not to describe them. It's obvious from the tags that a path is a path, so you don't also need to name it "path".

That does not look particularly park-like in aerial imagery, and the Pullman parks department is unaware of any park named "Egg Park", or of a park by any name in that location.

Thanks for your work in mapping the less-populated parts of Idaho.

OpenStreetMap measures elevations in meters, not feet, and lets end-user software decide what units to display it in. By changing the numbers for Stevens Peak, you've made it appear to be the tallest mountains in Idaho.

(I've changed it back.)

For future reference, the correct tag for a parking lot or parking garage is "car parking" (amenity=parking). "Parking space" is for if you're mapping the individual spaces within a parking lot.

In general, we don't record the ownership of private residences on the map.

What was the assignment, to vandalize the map? I believe everything in this changeset has been deleted as having no basis in reality.

Is it really called "Short Pointless Path"?

Is there really a hospital in the Cheney Fire Department building?

The "name" field should only be used for the actual name of something. What sort of thing it is is indicated by tags such as "commercial area".

I've reverted this change. As best I can tell, the "park" is a vacant lot and the footway doesn't exist. Further, the change messed up the data for bus route #160 by adding the vacant lot to it.

Is there a reason why you think that the Centennial Trail is better classified as a footway than as a cycleway? Sure, it probably sees more foot traffic than bicycle traffic, but it's advertised as a cycle route, marked as a cycle route, and everyone knows it as a cycle route.

If you put the address in the address field rather than the name field, route-finding software can use it when users enter it as their destination.

Are you sure about the park you added just north of the cemetery? It looks to me like it's just somebody's house.

The "name" field should only be used for actual names. Attributes such as "this is a sidewalk" are indicated by appropriate tagging.

A "Code Blue Emergency Station" sounds like it should be tagged as an "emergency phone" (emergency=phone). Is this correct?

Cheney Community Church is mapped twice here, once as a node with an address of 205 Pine Street, and once as a building with an address of 1307 3rd Street. Which one is correct?

Please only map things that actually exist.

I don't know if the watercourse you've modified is better mapped as a "stream" or a "ditch", but I'm confident enough that there isn't a meadow, a pond, a lake, or a Reformed Zoroastrian temple at the intersection of Third and Roosevelt that I've deleted them. I've also deleted the meadow in the parking lot of the Palouse Mall.

Is there an actual park here? On the aerial imagery, it looks like it's just a vacant lot.

You appear to have re-named the United States in this changeset. Consequently, I've reverted it.