Please don't just scribble out buildings. It takes hours to clean them up.

Is there a reason why you tagged a section of WA-206 as "primary"? The usual convention is that state routes are tagged as "secondary" unless they're particularly significant or particularly minor (and WA-206 is verging on "particularly minor").

It's also not how they're labeled on the signposts -- it's just a bare campsite number.

The Specimen Ridge trail doesn't have a bridge across the Lamar River, either.

If the editor is telling you about a path that's crossing a river, don't just click the "add a bridge" button to make it go away. There very much isn't a bridge across Slough Creek at the spot you added one.

Where are you getting the bridges on the Pelican Valley trail from? Aerial imagery doesn't show them.

Why on Earth did you delete the Grand Prismatic Spring overlook?

That map says it's based on OpenStreetMap.

Liberty Cap isn't a mountain peak, it's a rock formation.

I know for sure that "Canyon Campground road" is wrong, and I'm reasonably sure the rest of the names are as well. (Source: my parents spent a season working at Canyon Campground.) I'll be reverting the batch.

I've reverted this changeset.

I added those because I hiked them and have GPS traces showing the routing.

OSM isn't supposed to be a copy of various official maps, it's supposed to be the result of looking at what's actually there. Just because something isn't on an official map isn't a reason to delete it.

As far as I can tell, the paths you deleted still exist. Why did you delete them?

Where did you get this name from? The BC government has some very different names for this section of highway.

The most common way to map a business inside a building is to add a point with the business information; a more detailed method is the Simple Indoor Tagging scheme: osm.wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging

Drawing one building over another just confuses everyone involved.

I don't think an access of "permissive" is correct for something that's in a public park.

When you divide a road like you did at the intersection of Lancaster and US-95, please make sure you update the lane counts and move the traffic signals to the new intersection points.

How about we call it the "Elko-Roosville Highway", since that's what the BC government seems to call it: https://web.archive.org/web/20170105151258/http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/transportation-reports-and-reference/numbered-routes#

The section between Revere Road and Imbler Creek is packed fine gravel. I don't know what it's like any further west than that.

Is US-2 physically divided here? Recent imagery isn't sharp enough to show something like a median barrier.

If it isn't, then please don't map it as such -- with a pair of ways, there's nowhere to put the center turn lane that's visible in older imagery.