Yes, not "disappearing", but the old grass median is gone. Thanks.

This is a tricky section. Looks like there is a separated bicycle track that then disappears to allow right hand turns for vehicles. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.650912000000005&lng=12.527581000000055&z=17&pKey=ra2QUlcWFisImKLnlTqw1Q&focus=photo

I'm not sure this road should be deleted. Please double check.

I think you may be right. How would you tag for a bicycle track in a roundabout? cycleway:right=lane

Thank you, I should have looked at that.

Osorno osm.org/#map=13/-40.5772/-73.1313

Por ejemplo en Osorno, hay muchos problemas con clasificaciones allí. Me gustaría arreglar esto, pero no quiero que los cambie después. ¿Cambiarías algo en Osorno?

Las vías tertiary conectan ciudades y pueblos más pequeños. Algunos caminos tertiary que he encontrado no conducen a ningún lugar de importancia y no tienen una salida o conexión a otro lugar. Así que en mi opinión no es necesario ser tertiary. La idea principal de las clasificaciones es la funcionalidad del camino, según el wiki, no necesariamente lo que el gobierno local lo llama. ¿Qué piensas?

¿Dónde puedo encontrar esta legislación sobre las carreteras?

Lo mismo aquí en esta area, me gustaría saber el razonamiento de los cambios de clase de carretera. Todos mis ediciones del camino se basan en el wiki (función y importancia total) y mis viajes personales en Suramérica. ¡Gracias!

Hola, no creo que esta sección debe ser una "motorway". ¿Tienes una razón por la que debe ser "motorway"? Las "motorway" deben ser las carreteras más importantes de un país y tienen especificaciones definidas. ¡Gracias!

Hola, no creo que esta sección debe ser una "motorway". El resto del camino es "primary". ¿Tienes una razón por la que debe ser "motorway"? Las "motorway" deben ser las carreteras más importantes de un país y tienen especificaciones definidas. ¡Gracias!

That is a mistake, thank you for catching that. I will fix it.

Careful, Sheraouh Street is a divided street. I was there in Oct 2016. :) I have divided it out again.

I was also going to ask about these . . . there are no "viewpoints" for tourism. Since they were created on Maps.me, I'm guessing these may be bad data.

Fixed, thanks. Let me know if you see anything else. I will be verifying my work with videos I took very soon.

Thanks, I fixed it to what I remember. This was edited on an iPad and sometimes things don't connect properly, but I do go through my work after the fact with videos I took to verify things.

This comment was by accident and forgot to be changed to apply to Uruguay.

I also met with the local mappers while in Santiago, and they didn't care either way about the trees since none of them put it in. The user was from the UK I believe.

My team did 3 weeks worth of ground work in Santiago. We found in editing that the trees were hard to work around because there were so many. Also, the trees were not accurate as we were having to move them off of buildings and out of the middle of roads, etc. I did talk to the user who imported them and he said it was fine to take them out. Either he or I can re-import them in the future. Personally I wouldn't do that, since the accuracy is off, but he is welcome to. Thanks~