Thanks for contributing!

Apologies for the large changeset

Note as well that the forest service doc has trails that are being declared as no-longer maintained, but because I'm unaware of the validity of this in 2025, I am leaving them marked as operated by the Forest Service.

as well as https://arizona-content.usedirect.com/storage/Catalina-Trail-Map-2025.pdf

See more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%CA%BCodham_language

https://azdot.gov/news/adot-reopens-improved-i-10-orange-grove-interchange (and survey)
https://docs.tep.com/wp-content/uploads/TEP-Ten-Year-Plan-Transmission-Projects-2023-2032-Maps.pdf

Go ahead and remove it, I must have accidently pressed the balloon or shrink-wrap key.
Thank you.

Also bing streetview

Hello,
I understand by having "SRP" in the name of these substations may make it easier to identify the operator, however, that is not their name. Please refrain from doing this.
Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Hello Cooper,

Are these railroads real?

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

Also here are some examples of good and bad:
Good (remaining grade): way/1192768798
Bad (no trace): way/1303525751#map=18/44.76574/-85.62568

Hi cmxn,

The general consensus in the community is that only railways with remaining remnants on the ground (such as a remaining grade as the bar minimum) should be mapped. Otherwise, these "abandoned" railways should not be mapped. However, this kind of work is perfect for OpenHistoricalMap at openhistoricalmap.org. There's some discussion on it here, if you're interested: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposing-to-deprecate-railway-razed-and-railway-dismantled/109679/64

I will probably delete the railways that you have mapped in a week or so or whenever you have had time to move them over to OHM.

Thanks, BubbaJuice

Hello,

Please do not remove detail from the map. I will be reverting this changeset.

Most of this track exists, why did you delete the whole thing?

No, it isn't. I recommend you check resources before deleting buildings that you have only have the story about. https://www.shopfoothillsmall.com/

What's your source for the refs of some of these power towers?
For example: node/688865222

Sorry for big bbox didn't know I went so far south.

Fixed in changeset/151872645

I changed the name tag to alt_name because the bolt has no real name (that I know of I haven't looked into the actual descriptions of the survey), this is simply a nickname that has been associated with the bolt (this I am confident of). Perhaps loc_name is a better fit.

What sign designates way/20689132/history as a private road?