Thanks. I'll fix it soon.

Vandalism not appreciated.

Sorry for leaving you hanging. Depends on the structure. I can fix them for you if you link me the Q/A tool.

Yep. Greg can't keep data quality consistent. He doesn't really care about data quality.

Thanks for catching that!

Sorry if I messed anything up. Lots of conflicts...

Sorry if I messed anything up. Lots of conflicts...

Hello mycota,

It seems like you added incorrect intermittent values around way/353557530. Please change the intermittent back to how they were when introduced in changeset/103745899.

Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Separating them by a few inches removes the fact that they are above each other and on the same structure. I will not be doing that. If you link me to the Q/A tool I can add appropriate layers to the items. If that does not solve it, it's the Q/A tool's fault.

I'm sorry that happens. It is just a matter of the fact that the switches in this case are right on top of each other. Perhaps I am missing a layer that would be helpful in this case. Is that the correct solution to this?

Hello Joseph,

Please do not map highway links with no physical barrier between it and the highway like you have done here: way/1068397303.

Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Hello Seth,

Roundabouts are not mapped as highway links but as regular roads.

Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Just letting you know this is completely fictional. A check of different imageries shows that the connection was how it was previously.

way/1014928106 Is not a train station and this should not be tagged as such.

way/340387590 is also not a station of any kind.

Hey Karson,

`water=stream` and `water=river` should not have the name of the stream/river on them.

Thanks.

Road access restrictions based on survey.

Thank you, I really appreciate it. I don't know of any road data that could be used to improve OSM. There is TIGER but most of that data is already in the database.

Hello Emanueli,

These roads are not parking aisles but driveways. See service=parking_aisle#Examples Please revert your tag change.

Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Hello sairajdu,

I believe these roads are not oneway roads. Why did you tag them as so?

Hello Bhakta66,

This is not how you add oneway streets. You split the road using 'x' in iD. You then tag that split segment with 'oneway=yes'. This avoids roads that share the same segment, which is never how something should be mapped. Otherwise, thanks for fixing my note.

Regards,
BubbaJuice