It is preferred to spell out street names in addresses on OpenStreetMap. I fixed this, but please keep this in mind in the future. Thank you!

Is this really a silo? It almost looks like a circus tent to me.

Another person mapped the restroom besides City Hall right before you, causing them to end up right on top of each other.

This user hasn't come back. Think these need another look.

Thanks for adding these buildings to OpenStreetMap! Be sure to hit Q to orthogonalize the buildings after you draw them.

No need for snark, fiscal — though Amazon edits are generally not of great quality, that's on the company for not properly training employees.

MikeN, I had no trouble cleaning up the building shape using the orthogonalize shape tool in iD. I fixed it in changeset/100163466.

The county boundaries are a bit off here. It makes it look like all of these buildings are actually in Canyon County. The boundary follows section lines though.

A building you don't like is not a "mapping error". Of course, you're well aware of this fact.

I assume start_date=motorway] on way/255509273 was accidental

And yet it has stayed.

request (v.)

to *ask* for, especially politely or formally

You've asked, and been denied. You're no longer asking, but rather demanding and helping yourself.

You're not respectfully requesting anything. You are in fact completely disrespecting the millions of people who use this dataset.

Good catch. This happened because I merged downloaded data onto the MapWithAI layer rather than adding it with Shift+A.

I'm done being courteous. You're not requesting anything, and you've been warned far beyond the point to where this can be construed as innocent. Imagine if I destroyed the gates and security cameras you placed around your property. That's essentially what you're doing to the map. I don't own your gates, and you don't own the map. Stop deleting this data now.

Oh, he knows. He's now deleted this data 9 times. Why the DWG hasn't stepped in, especially with my report, is a mystery to me.

Incredible! Here's to 100 million more.

You have no right to delete real features simply because you don't like them. What you are doing is vandalising a map used by millions of people every day.

A veteran mapper has explained to you why you can't "authorize" anyone to do anything, yet you've once again deleted these features. I've restored them again, and have contacted the Data Working Group.

Please respond to the changeset comment here: changeset/99797891

The driveway you deleted was already marked as private. This isn't a matter of authorization. These features were deleted previously by Map_Manager, which makes me suspect that you are the same person, especially as this is your first changeset. I have reverted your deletions.