Allison P's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 149070933 | It seems clear I am not the only one who views it as cruft. |
|
| 153266957 | I did not, and I forgot iD defaults to clockwise. |
|
| 153975882 | These streets have no sidewalks, why did you add them? |
|
| 153875069 | And if you wash your car every day it looks clean, but it's a pain to do it! What you are describing is a form of tagging for the renderer. We are not in the business of making a pretty map. We are assembling geographic data that can be used by anyone, for free, to make a map that suits their needs. By connecting landuse to roads, you are contributing incorrect data (because you are suggesting that roadbed is actually commercial/park/retail) and making it very difficult to edit. What looks clean is subjective. What's easiest to map, less so. Do not continue mapping in this way. |
|
| 58392823 | You've got a Phoenix address in Georgia there way/583381189 |
|
| 153800888 | "blue_turf" is not a distinct surface value. The color is already reflected in the colour tag.
|
|
| 153819030 | Awesome work adding/updating all these tracks! I get really frustrated trying to fix TIGER geometry. |
|
| 144850198 | way/1229199662: Prophecy? |
|
| 142692716 | Looks like you tagged the entirety of way/458911987 as covered. |
|
| 153496028 | It looks like the URLs have the store number in them. Possible to extract refs? |
|
| 153475364 | Please submit changes before moving to a new area, especially across the country. |
|
| 153350272 | Then when asked to explain your edits, you should do so without fail. What did you do in this changeset? ("Look at it" is not a sufficient explanation.) |
|
| 153429542 | It is not. The stadium is already named properly. You are tagging the field, not the stadium. |
|
| 153436397 | The scrub area shouldn't overlap the river area, as much of a pain as it is to separate the two. |
|
| 153426981 | That is the name of the stadium, not the field. Reverted. |
|
| 153421379 | Don't do this! This is tagging for the renderer and not allowed on OSM. |
|
| 153323382 | It's not. Someone used the wrong tag. |
|
| 110883406 | Any legit reason not to? |
|
| 134753958 | The names are back. |
|
| 152935447 | The wiki is vague because there hasn't been a proposal to standardize fire station tagging. With that said, you tagged the building and grounds just how I'd do it. |