Hmm, not sure how they ended up as triangles. Thanks for fixing those buildings!

Chatham has the population and amenities typical of a town. The types of municipalities in Illinois don't align with how the values for place=* are typically used. I'm not sure how appropriate place=village is for it.

Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Just so you know, the service roads you added were demolished a couple of years ago. The Bing imagery in the area is more recent than Mapbox, so if you map here in the future, I recommend using it instead.

Is "South Ruftian Lane" correct? I haven't been there personally but according to the final plat it's spelled Ruffian.

Apparently the part of 3rd Street I "corrected" to be a driveway was actually a continuation of the road. I'm addressing this.

These are residential roads, not service roads. They're also named. I fixed these issues, but please keep this in mind in the future!

Borah Park has already been mapped. Twice, strangely. There were some tags not on the old one though, so I'm transferring them over. Thank you for that information, but in the future make sure you're not duplicating a feature. Thank you!

Well, this sure puts my 528 node sidewalk to shame! I wonder if it'll hit 2000 once driveways are added in.

I don't know how I didn't notice this until 10 months later but a node on Jefferson Street got dragged a bit. Working on fixing it.

I made a mistake in the changeset comment. I was adding landuse based on features on the ground.

Those tags were present in the KML file I downloaded from TIGER. I forgot to fill out the source tag and forgot to delete them.

Some of these roads seem to have houses on them, which would make them residential, not track roads.

Considering my luck in the past with "fixing" the river this went well.

I'm not quite sure what you did, but Eagle Island no longer renders properly, so I had to revert this.

It looks like Riley Court is disconnected from the highway system, why is that?

I don't think section lines should be a part of OSM. They aren't on-the-ground features.

Why did you mark a feature as a ford? Looking at the satellite imagery it's clear that the canal goes underneath the road in a culvert.

Why did you abbreviate the direction of East Cedar Place? Directions and road name types are supposed to be fully expanded.

@Kovoschiz, I've brought this up before when the relation was created but received no response. Based on osm.wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories your suspicion is correct. I wonder if this might require contacting the DWG.

I've been trying to find a name for this canal for quite some time; where did you find it?