Please don't mark individual plots. The subdivision itself is mapped, as are the houses.

I got a list of every park in Boise and added basic info to all of them. That said, I've never heard of this one before nor seen it.

Yes, it is blocked off, and probably should be access=no, but it would otherwise be tertiary.

I presume it will be rebuilt soon, so it's probably not a big deal.

Make sure to expand the predirectional (W -> West)

way/978054570 is not under construction. This road segment is unpaved but still legally a public mid-mile collector.

Mace Road and Island Wood Drive is the main road to access hundreds of houses. I believe tertiary is more appropriate.

Then it should be marked as private, not deleted.

disused=yes is generally an unpopular tag, but here it seems especially inappropriate. The meaning is essentially "exists but isn't in use, though it could be". The shop is gone for good. Any relevant tags can probably be deleted. Of course, as long as the building stands and could see a new tenant, building=retail is still approrpriate.

Mapping features that are inactive has always been a point of contention and even expert mappers disagree frequently. However, if you want to map historical features in general, you might consider OpenHistoricalMap.

That's depressing, but I'm not surprised.

Hmm, a cinema called cinema? Doesn't seem right... node/3699518627

The plat has finally been recorded and it has Drive. Is an ACHD report in order?

Probably not necessary to check so often.

Tag "branches_in_your_face"? way/32870031

I don't believe Strahler numbers are appropriate for OSM. It can be calculated from the data. It is not in use anywhere else in the database as far as I can tell.

These buildings are of unacceptably low quality. Please retrace them, or else they will be removed.

As I don't see much in the way of amenities, I might even go all the way down to a hamlet.

I would not call Pomona Park a town. Places on OSM do not correspond to legal classification, but rather size and amenities. node/154048960

My bad...

Made a bulk edit when I was new to OSM.

Well, turns out I didn't properly account for addresses I deleted between then and now and I readded them all. Oops! Still don't have a good way to account for them short of not touching the data at all.

Once a year seems pretty reasonable if it takes eight hours. Wonder how many street names will end up needing corrected.